Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:34:42
Server time: 20:25:17, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): JourneyKan | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Homosexuality on the Military Reform Act of 2560

Details

Submitted by[?]: The Liberal Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2561

Description[?]:

I do not like the wording of this proposal. The word "tolerated" should be changed to "encouraged". Homosexuality will still be allowed but the "don't ask, don't tell" policy will be implemented.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:32:40, April 14, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Homosexuality on the Military Reform Act of 2560
Messagethis bill is a disgrace.

Date04:55:58, April 14, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Homosexuality on the Military Reform Act of 2560
MessageIf you read the description of this bill, I say that tolerated is not a good word for it, encouraged may be a better choice. My goal was to implement the "don't ask, don't tell" policy.

Date05:25:25, April 14, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Homosexuality on the Military Reform Act of 2560
Messagewhy is don't ask, don't tell good policy?

Date05:47:59, April 14, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Homosexuality on the Military Reform Act of 2560
MessageIn reality, homosexuals may be discriminated by others in the military. The "don't ask, don't tell" policy prevents this from happening because soldiers are not allowed to ask other soldiers whether or not they are homosexuals, they won't feel the pressure of isclosing their sexual preference.

Date07:07:46, April 14, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Homosexuality on the Military Reform Act of 2560
Messagethat's such horribly twisted logic. this follows a liberal pattern of rolling back laws banning discrimination while claiming to champion equality. I'm glad to see this bill defeated

Date23:04:13, April 14, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Homosexuality on the Military Reform Act of 2560
MessageYou should be better informed. The "don't ask, don't tell" policy is a conservative idea, created by conservatives.

Date06:12:59, April 15, 2008 CET
FromUnited Republics Party
ToDebating the Homosexuality on the Military Reform Act of 2560
Messagewhen i say liberals have twisted logic, i'm referring to you - not 'out of character' liberals.

Date06:35:23, April 27, 2008 CET
FromPariah Idealism
ToDebating the Homosexuality on the Military Reform Act of 2560
Message=?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 54

no
     

Total Seats: 81

abstain
  

Total Seats: 15


Random fact: Unless otherwise stated, monarchs and their royal houses will be presumed to be owned by the player who introduced the bill appointing them to their position.

Random quote: "When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called 'the People's Stick.'" - Mikhail Bakunin

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59