We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: GJA Sexuality - 5.12.2561.AD
Details
Submitted by[?]: New Socialist Agenda
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2562
Description[?]:
"Why stain our international relations by making something technically illegal that is actually beyond the control of the government?" -Raamiah Galgenstrick, Chairman of the GJA Foreign Minister of the SJHB |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The legality of interracial sex.
Old value:: Only heterosexual interracial sex is allowed.
Current: Interracial sex is legal.
Proposed: Interracial sex is legal.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on sexual relations.
Old value:: Heterosexual relationships only are legal for consenting adults.
Current: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Proposed: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:18:33, April 14, 2008 CET | From | Ma'avak | To | Debating the GJA Sexuality - 5.12.2561.AD |
Message | OOC: The elections will push these back to debate. |
Date | 21:54:25, April 14, 2008 CET | From | New Socialist Agenda | To | Debating the GJA Sexuality - 5.12.2561.AD |
Message | [OOC] Yes, of course. I forgot. Oh well, any IC comments on the bill? |
Date | 01:40:11, April 15, 2008 CET | From | Jewish Mothers' Union | To | Debating the GJA Sexuality - 5.12.2561.AD |
Message | We agree that the law is not a legitimate or practical instrument to govern private areas of people's lives like these. The threat of prosecutions under these laws leads to blackmail and misery. Melanie Koffenbaum (Leader of the JMU). |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 129 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 228 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 43 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "People say I steal. Well, all politicians steal." - Huey Long |