We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: PR Cabinet Proposal (October 2567)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Urban Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2568
Description[?]:
| Political Representatives: KLC Royalists Young Kafurs Liberals |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Royalist Party of Islam
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Aldurian Protectorate Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Royalist Party of Islam
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Kafuri Socialist Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Liberal Urban Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Kafuri Socialist Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Aldurian Protectorate Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Liberal Urban Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Aldurian Protectorate Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Royalist Party of Islam
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Kafuri Socialist Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Liberal Urban Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Liberal Urban Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:10:40, April 27, 2008 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the PR Cabinet Proposal (October 2567) |
| Message | As we seem unable to find a common agreement, while we appear to be on the verge of a conflict once more, we propose this cabinet proposal and question all participants parties whether it is acceptable or not. |
| Date | 19:29:43, April 27, 2008 CET | From | Kafuri Socialist Party | To | Debating the PR Cabinet Proposal (October 2567) |
| Message | Sure. |
| Date | 21:41:12, April 27, 2008 CET | From | Judiciary Patriciate Coalition | To | Debating the PR Cabinet Proposal (October 2567) |
| Message | This seems a quite frankly bizarre cabinet, containing far right, far left, liberal and royalist all in one clump. |
| Date | 22:42:22, April 27, 2008 CET | From | Aldurian Protectorate Party | To | Debating the PR Cabinet Proposal (October 2567) |
| Message | In order that our nation has a government we shall back this, but we are disappointed that the other proposal fell through. |
| Date | 01:01:36, April 28, 2008 CET | From | Royalist Party of Islam | To | Debating the PR Cabinet Proposal (October 2567) |
| Message | Agreef. |
| Date | 01:01:55, April 28, 2008 CET | From | Royalist Party of Islam | To | Debating the PR Cabinet Proposal (October 2567) |
| Message | OOC: Agreed, rather. |
| Date | 10:49:25, April 28, 2008 CET | From | Liberal Urban Party | To | Debating the PR Cabinet Proposal (October 2567) |
| Message | MHP, organization issues, such as the wiki and the system itself, international emergencies and economical problems, such as closing further deals in order to ensure economical stability, call for a united cabinet, from all political sides, who shall be determined to maintain internal order. Therefore, we propose and avidly support this. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 516 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 101 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 98 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "Freedom is not worth having if it does not connote freedom to err." - Mahatma Gandhi |