We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Dura Lex - Regulation of Administration
Details
Submitted by[?]: Right Wing Radicals
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2570
Description[?]:
| Dura Lex - Regulation of Administration |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning granting citizenship.
Old value:: Citizenship is granted to all nationals.
Current: Citizenship is granted to all nationals.
Proposed: Citizenship is gained by passing a qualifying exam.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Appointments and requirements for government employees.
Old value:: Government employees are selected and appointed in a political way.
Current: All government employees have to promise political independence.
Proposed: All government employees have to promise political independence.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government-issued identity card policy.
Old value:: Citizens are not issued with identity cards.
Current: All citizens are issued with identity cards but are not required to carry them.
Proposed: All citizens are issued with identity cards and are required to carry them at all times.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:08:54, April 28, 2008 CET | From | Democratic Benevolence | To | Debating the Dura Lex - Regulation of Administration |
| Message | Regulations need to be in place to ensure the welfare of the country and to protect any infringement through free and unchecked immigration |
| Date | 16:00:39, April 29, 2008 CET | From | Democratic Benevolence | To | Debating the Dura Lex - Regulation of Administration |
| Message | "This is pork-barrel politics. How can one justifiably support Article 2 and Article 3 while stringently opposed to Article 1. My honourable colleague from the Radical Right Wing Party should understand that to force someone to abstain from political participation is an act within itself of controlling or imposing in the private affairs of the citizen." |
| Date | 16:56:32, May 01, 2008 CET | From | Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Dura Lex - Regulation of Administration |
| Message | Support article 1 but not the rest. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 17 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 98 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 6 |
| Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy. |
| Random quote: "Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself." - Mark Twain |