Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5475
Next month in: 02:37:48
Server time: 13:22:11, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): starfruit | Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Azael Initiative: Emir control

Details

Submitted by[?]: Judiciary Patriciate Coalition

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2575

Description[?]:

This bill passes control of provinces onto the Emirs of each province as they are elected. The "military" in these bills is the paramilitary of the party involved.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:05:20, May 11, 2008 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Azael Initiative: Emir control
MessageArticle 1: No.

Article 2: No.

Article 3: Yes.

Date01:21:24, May 11, 2008 CET
FromJudiciary Patriciate Coalition
ToDebating the Azael Initiative: Emir control
MessageCould you explain your positions? And any compromise available

Date01:34:05, May 11, 2008 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Azael Initiative: Emir control
MessageArticle 1: Decreases our total number of armed individuals available and distracts the military from their real purpose. Also, my militia is often out of country so this would leave Kuchifey without any security forces some of the time.

Article 2: I've just decided to switch to being a pro-weapon, anti-weapon regulation party.

Date01:36:54, May 11, 2008 CET
FromJudiciary Patriciate Coalition
ToDebating the Azael Initiative: Emir control
MessageWhat is their real purpose? We have no international relations to speak of at present, let alone hostile ones.
Actually no it wouldn't, seeing as that Emirate is not under your control.

Fair enough, strange shift to make

Date01:38:26, May 11, 2008 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Azael Initiative: Emir control
MessageIt's not? Whose control is it under then?

Date02:29:45, May 11, 2008 CET
FromJudiciary Patriciate Coalition
ToDebating the Azael Initiative: Emir control
MessageThe communist party

Date02:31:17, May 11, 2008 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Azael Initiative: Emir control
MessageAh, they do control the governorship don't they? Guess it's good they're not a member of the P-TRA then.

Date11:51:01, May 11, 2008 CET
FromJudiciary Patriciate Coalition
ToDebating the Azael Initiative: Emir control
MessageSurely the P-TRA doesn't claim all your militia?

Date12:02:43, May 11, 2008 CET
FromKafuri Socialist Party
ToDebating the Azael Initiative: Emir control
MessageYep. Unless I've asked to hold onto it. Which I haven't.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 114

no
   

Total Seats: 438

abstain
   

Total Seats: 163


Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363

Random quote: "I have come to the conclusion that politics are too serious a matter to be left to the politicians." - Charles de Gaulle

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 65