Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5477
Next month in: 01:56:55
Server time: 14:03:04, April 30, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): JWDL | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Family Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2600

Description[?]:

A bill to protect family as the core unit of society, and bring the decision making about family issues such as adoption, marriage and divorce closer to the people.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:38:38, June 27, 2008 CET
From Conservative Party
ToDebating the Family Act
MessageArt. 1 and 3 are proposed to prevent Davosta to become in the future a nation of "empty playgrounds" and aging population, which is something highly undesireble for the subsistence of a society.

Art. 2, 4-6 are proposed for the local governments to decide on family issues, in an attempt to reach a more communal-based decision making on these matters.

Date03:13:18, June 28, 2008 CET
From Partido Santanderista
ToDebating the Family Act
Messagewholeheartedly disagree

Date18:03:35, June 28, 2008 CET
From NWOIAUCFCCNUCDMFSatanilicRepublicanParty
ToDebating the Family Act
MessageRight Hand SRP Representative Rev. Marv: We wholeheartedly agree.

Date19:19:58, June 28, 2008 CET
From Partido Laborista Socialista
ToDebating the Family Act
Message"Unión Demócrata Liberal"? Hah, don't make us laugh. More like "Unión Demócrata Conservador"!

Date23:52:30, June 28, 2008 CET
From Partido Conservador de Davostan
ToDebating the Family Act
MessageWe agree with most of the UDL proposals, but we also notice that the party seems to mislead the voters with its acronym.

Our main point of disagreement is Article 4. We believe marriage should not be devolved to local government. If this article is struck down, the party will support this bill.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
  

Total Seats: 68

abstain
   

Total Seats: 68


Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves." - Abraham Lincoln

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 91