We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Anti- Crime Act: Gambling Regulation
Details
Submitted by[?]: Rutanian Democratic Forum
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2602
Description[?]:
| A regulation of gambling policy. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The right to gamble.
Old value:: Gambling is legal across the nation, no regulation whatsoever.
Current: The legality of gambling is a matter of local governments.
Proposed: Gambling is illegal unless taking place in a licensed casino.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:32:23, July 03, 2008 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Anti- Crime Act: Gambling Regulation |
| Message | We concur with this. |
| Date | 03:05:23, July 04, 2008 CET | From | Federal Rutanian Libertarian Union | To | Debating the Anti- Crime Act: Gambling Regulation |
| Message | We do not, we believe that gambling should be able to occur anywhere in the nation free of government interference. This is now too far an infringement on what the people of Rutania can and cannot do, and also places great strain on law enforcement who would be then prosecuting victimless crimes. |
| Date | 06:39:36, July 04, 2008 CET | From | Federal Rutanian Libertarian Union | To | Debating the Anti- Crime Act: Gambling Regulation |
| Message | Further, we dont see how this is an anti-crime act if we are criminalising a perfectly normal and enjoyable pastime. |
| Date | 21:21:47, July 04, 2008 CET | From | The National Party for the People | To | Debating the Anti- Crime Act: Gambling Regulation |
| Message | We agree with the LP AND the LCP. |
| Date | 09:48:27, July 05, 2008 CET | From | Federal Rutanian Libertarian Union | To | Debating the Anti- Crime Act: Gambling Regulation |
| Message | Doesnt that mean we should find a comprimise? =P |
| Date | 11:57:00, July 05, 2008 CET | From | Rutanian Democratic Forum | To | Debating the Anti- Crime Act: Gambling Regulation |
| Message | maybe? :) |
| Date | 14:17:43, July 05, 2008 CET | From | The National Party for the People | To | Debating the Anti- Crime Act: Gambling Regulation |
| Message | yes. Perhaps Gambling Permits, get a bit of money but still allowed to play poker in the dining room after dinner. |
| Date | 17:42:42, July 05, 2008 CET | From | Federal Rutanian Libertarian Union | To | Debating the Anti- Crime Act: Gambling Regulation |
| Message | Yeah, we will support this bill and then offer the next step from this instead - allowing it in private homes and casinos, but no more. |
| Date | 22:42:04, July 05, 2008 CET | From | Rutanian Democratic Forum | To | Debating the Anti- Crime Act: Gambling Regulation |
| Message | RRDF could agree to such a policy. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 585 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 14 |
| Random fact: The forum contains a lot of useful information, it has updates to the game, role playing between nations, news and discussion. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "Even when laws have been written down, they ought not always to remain unaltered." - Aristotle |