Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:34:51
Server time: 20:25:08, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Private Energy Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Mouvement pour la Kanjor

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2604

Description[?]:

The Mouvement wishes to reposition itself as a liberal economic party. We feel we must srive a more economically flexible Kanjor, that cannot be provided by the state.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:23:52, July 09, 2008 CET
From Bloc de gauche
ToDebating the Private Energy Bill
MessageNon.
We disagree.
The state should provide the energy, thereby ensuring fair wages and fair prices for the employees and the buyers.

Date20:39:49, July 09, 2008 CET
FromParti National-Socialiste TK
ToDebating the Private Energy Bill
MessageWe are most disappointed with this repositioning of the MlpK. We'll have to agree with the Commies on this one. The state should provide this basic need and not rely on profit driven investors to supply our citizens with power.

Date20:41:57, July 09, 2008 CET
From Bloc de gauche
ToDebating the Private Energy Bill
MessageWe reject calls of our being communist.
We are a socialist-labour party.

Date23:55:13, July 09, 2008 CET
FromAlduria Nous Emmerde
ToDebating the Private Energy Bill
MessageANE supports the proposed.

Date07:47:06, July 10, 2008 CET
FromParti de la patrie
ToDebating the Private Energy Bill
MessagePrivate corporation brings about a competitve market which offers the people better results and better prices. Private corporation is good for Kanjor and we support this bill.

Date07:51:31, July 10, 2008 CET
FromParti National-Socialiste TK
ToDebating the Private Energy Bill
MessageSocialist-labour? With your proposals? It does not matter. We wholeheartedly must disagree with the MlpK unfortunately. We may be more in tune with Kanjoran tradition, but we fear that these laws will blow the floodgates open to create our mighty nation into a capitalist playground run by fake Kanjorans.

Date21:10:36, July 10, 2008 CET
FromMouvement pour la Kanjor
ToDebating the Private Energy Bill
MessageWe have decided to not to shift our stance as of the moment. But we still feel that this is an appropriate measure to be voted upon.

Date02:11:20, July 11, 2008 CET
FromParti Libertaire
ToDebating the Private Energy Bill
MessageMost excellent.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 137

no
    

Total Seats: 363

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining.

    Random quote: "To punish the oppressors of humanity is clemency; to forgive them is barbarity." - Maximilien Robespierre

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 84