We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Free Communication: Revisited
Details
Submitted by[?]: Beach Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2118
Description[?]:
Our communication network is in a terrible state. [check the stats] [I'm willing to compromise on this one tho.] |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning phone services.
Old value:: There are no regulations on phone service.
Current: The state regulates the rates providers can charge for phone service.
Proposed: The state subsidizes the phone service of low income families but does not regulate the rates providers can charge for phone service.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:27:45, September 27, 2005 CET | From | Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the Free Communication: Revisited |
Message | Improving the quality of communication networks by providing services free of charge? There are no references for the outcome of that solution. our party offers a couple of solutions to that problem: 1.) Public communication should be in the hands of private companies, that is the major initiate to improve the quality of those services. Competition leads towards low prices and high quality providers. 2.) Appropriate a larger sum for infrastructure on our next budget. |
Date | 00:55:12, September 28, 2005 CET | From | Parti Monarchiste Catholique | To | Debating the Free Communication: Revisited |
Message | We support the statements of our colleagues in the Liberal Democrats. |
Date | 04:35:23, September 28, 2005 CET | From | Beach Party | To | Debating the Free Communication: Revisited |
Message | How about "The state subsidizes the phone service of low income families but does not regulate the rates providers can charge for phone service."? My attempts to increase the budget ended with nothing being decided. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 38 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 81 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 81 |
Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed). |
Random quote: "The more you observe politics, the more you've got to admit that each party is worse than the other." - Will Rogers |