Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5476
Next month in: 02:20:01
Server time: 09:39:58, April 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Infinite | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Foreign Investment Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: National Bolshevik Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2611

Description[?]:

National companies have the right to approve if a foreign investor can have ANY share in itself. Even stakes of less than a majority holding can greatly influence the health of these industries vital to our national security interests.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:18:29, July 23, 2008 CET
FromDranland First Party (CC)
ToDebating the Foreign Investment Bill
MessageUsually we advocate free foreign investment so long as the investors do not gain a majority share, but as we agree with the sentiment of this legislation, we will support. Dranland must always come first.

Date17:00:36, July 23, 2008 CET
FromNational Bolshevik Party
ToDebating the Foreign Investment Bill
MessageAgain we don't think we even have national companies but in the case they should come into existence we should be able to determine who is friend or foe when it comes to investments, just like the weapons exports bill. The United Front is pleased the Reform Party can support such sensible legislation.

Date17:39:47, July 23, 2008 CET
FromNational Bolshevik Party
ToDebating the Foreign Investment Bill
Message// I was under the impression it meant national as in state-controlled, in the sense they are nationalized, not that they are domestic firms. I apologize, so keep that in mind in the above message. //

Date01:48:59, July 24, 2008 CET
FromDranland First Party (CC)
ToDebating the Foreign Investment Bill
MessageOOC: I was under the assumption that it meant all domestic businesses and industries? In any case, I can still support.

Date02:11:33, July 24, 2008 CET
FromNational Bolshevik Party
ToDebating the Foreign Investment Bill
MessageYeah, you're right. Ah well, I still support this.

Date02:55:12, July 24, 2008 CET
FromProgress and Liberty Party
ToDebating the Foreign Investment Bill
MessageOOC: So which is it? Does national companies mean state-owned enterprises, or all domestic firms?

Date02:55:37, July 24, 2008 CET
FromProgress and Liberty Party
ToDebating the Foreign Investment Bill
MessageI won't support the bill in either case.

Date03:01:43, July 24, 2008 CET
FromProgress and Liberty Party
ToDebating the Foreign Investment Bill
MessageI won't support the bill in either case.

Date03:07:06, July 24, 2008 CET
FromNational Bolshevik Party
ToDebating the Foreign Investment Bill
MessageIt's any domestic firm. I thought it was state-owned at first.

Date04:09:56, July 24, 2008 CET
FromProgress and Liberty Party
ToDebating the Foreign Investment Bill
MessageThanks.

In that case I don't support the status quo either.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 63

no
    

Total Seats: 108

abstain
  

Total Seats: 94


Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that.

Random quote: "What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans, and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty and democracy?" - Mahatma Gandhi.

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 61