Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 01:06:28
Server time: 18:53:31, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Welfare and Housing Reform Act, 2611

Details

Submitted by[?]: Federal Rutanian Libertarian Union

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2611

Description[?]:

An act to remove all loopholes that encourage the continuing dependence on government for sustinence.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:48:52, July 25, 2008 CET
From Rutanian Democratic Forum
ToDebating the Welfare and Housing Reform Act, 2611
MessageWe could accept only article 3.

Date14:47:07, July 25, 2008 CET
From Labour Party
ToDebating the Welfare and Housing Reform Act, 2611
Message"And if people are homeless or in poverty and cannot afford private housing or private rental accomodation, they can just starve, or die on the streets...?

There may be loopholes under the current system, but the new system will lead to far greater abuses and the far greater and obscene suffering of the human beings with whom we share and inhabit our nation. I would rather see a system with loop holes, but coupled with a guarantee that no-one need die homeless or face having no home, than face a system in which abuses will continue, but without any guarantee of the basic necessities of life. If abuse or loop-holes are a constant of BOTH systems, a guarantee of human dignity is not."

Chloe McCarthy, Labour Party Leader

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 237

no
    

Total Seats: 362

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar).

    Random quote: "While we may not always agree it is my hope that we may always be civil." - Jonathan Clarke, former Hutorian politician

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 58