Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5575
Next month in: 02:31:16
Server time: 17:28:43, November 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): AR Drax | Luzzina | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Liberty Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Gluaiseacht Shaoráil DhaonlathachIt

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2613

Description[?]:

To improve the personal freedom of our citizens.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:18:08, July 26, 2008 CET
FromFront for Popular Liberation
ToDebating the Liberty Act
MessageWe are opposed to article 1 but support all others, would it be possible to split the bill up?

Date17:45:16, July 26, 2008 CET
FromKirlawan National Party (Leftists)
ToDebating the Liberty Act
MessageAnti-patriotic, dangerous, anti-security, this will make our country more dangerous. We fully oppose.

Date20:24:45, July 26, 2008 CET
FromKirlawan People's National Congress
ToDebating the Liberty Act
MessageWe can't support this.

Date02:00:31, July 27, 2008 CET
FromKirlawan People's Justice Party
ToDebating the Liberty Act
MessageIf the articles display in the same order (sometimes they get shuffled from one reading to the next), our position on this bill is diametrically opposite to that of the FPL: we definitely favor the abolition of so-called "eminent domain", but oppose the other three articles.

Date08:43:07, July 27, 2008 CET
FromGluaiseacht Shaoráil DhaonlathachIt
ToDebating the Liberty Act
MessageWe will split art 1 from this bill.

Date12:36:56, July 27, 2008 CET
FromFront for Popular Liberation
ToDebating the Liberty Act
MessageThis now has our support

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 335

no
     

Total Seats: 299

abstain
  

Total Seats: 83


Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

Random quote: "Mine is the first generation able to contemplate the possibility that we may live our entire lives without going to war or sending our children to war." - Tony Blair

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 77