Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 00:00:38
Server time: 23:59:21, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Klexi | Svet-Aldegar | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of January 2653

Details

Submitted by[?]: Constitutional Monarchy Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2654

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:39:51, October 17, 2008 CET
FromKyoshi Lioness Militia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2653
MessageIn your dreams...

Date02:42:23, October 17, 2008 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2653
MessageOr reality mate.

Date15:00:06, October 17, 2008 CET
FromAggressive Sexist Movement of Beluzia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2653
Messagenice joke, let's see if you got the nuts to put it to vote.

Date19:12:32, October 17, 2008 CET
FromKyoshi Lioness Militia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2653
MessageMi-young Seo:

We put our cabinet proposal to a vote, even though the PSP knows damn well that it will fail in the parliament. It is because we are a party of principals, courage and freedom. We understand the importance of dialogue and democratic processes. The oppressors and reactionaries on the other hand, are cowards. They fear criticisms from the people. We embrace criticisms!

It looks like I'm more of a man than Hector Barbossa...I wonder if I should address him as "Helen" Barbossa
-Mi-young giggles in a cute manner-

Date19:23:26, October 17, 2008 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2653
MessageI was waiting for you to notice it! How can a dwarven wench have the cheek to address me in such a manner. I would watch ye step ye billed rats! Enter Pirate territory and I will be sure to sell you on the foreign market before anyone even notices!
I will put it to the vote, but my voters are not supporters of failure, which is what will happen to your party and everything it stands for!

-Captain HECTOR Barbossa II

Date19:55:50, October 17, 2008 CET
FromKyoshi Lioness Militia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2653
Message.....I am not a dwarf (ooc: My character is 1.66 meters tall, which is probably a little above average for a Korean female) I may not be as tall as you, but I am not a dwarf!

You should see before you speak, Barbossa the Blind!

Date19:55:50, October 17, 2008 CET
FromKyoshi Lioness Militia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2653
Message.....I am not a dwarf (ooc: My character is 1.66 meters tall, which is probably a little above average for a Korean female) I may not be as tall as you, but I am not a dwarf!

You should see before you speak, Barbossa the Blind!

Date20:07:14, October 17, 2008 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2653
MessageOOC: and you should not refresh ;-)

IC: I stand at 6ft 9 and can see perfectly well! I am considered the best shot with a pistol on the seas. Perhaps you are no dwarf, but you certainly arent a giant either! At least you know my name, yours I cannot remember.
-The Captain

Date20:21:46, October 17, 2008 CET
FromPeople's Populist Party - Zogist Mafia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2653
MessageThe name of the dragqueen in question is not pronounceable by the Beluzian tongue, for is a name common amongst the foriegn devils of Rutania!

Being that it is impossible to tell one of them from the other, and that even their gender is indistinguishable when they are clothed, asking us to make use of the demonic cacophony of gibbering madness they call a language, this is really all too much.

Through some mass hysteria, a Rutanian homosexual lobby has been allowed a place in the hallowed halls of our Beluzian Parliament, it may be true, but Laird Zog shall surely never speak in your forked tongues!~

Date20:32:57, October 17, 2008 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2653
MessageI ask the BDaFP to explain their decision to refuse our offer. We have offered a fair amount of seats to them, unlike the pinks who insulted you.

Date21:53:03, October 17, 2008 CET
FromBeluzian Defense and Federalist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2653
MessageDefine "fair"

I vote no, and I remain head of government. I vote yes, and I give that position up.

Why would I ever vote yes to this?

Date21:58:15, October 17, 2008 CET
FromConstitutional Monarchy Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2653
MessageOh, I thought I had put you as H.O.G...
Would you support if we gave you H.O.G?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 220

no
   

Total Seats: 391

abstain
  

Total Seats: 139


Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363

Random quote: "It all came from there." - Lech Walesa (pointing to a TV when a reporter asked him why communism fell)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 73