Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5470
Next month in: 00:20:19
Server time: 15:39:40, April 16, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): DanivonX | Nileowen_Kir | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Culture Act .01 2676

Details

Submitted by[?]: United People's Communist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2678

Description[?]:

Proposed modernising.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:04:09, December 06, 2008 CET
From United People's Communist Party
ToDebating the Culture Act .01 2676
MessageAny constructive discussion is appreciated.

Date11:33:42, December 06, 2008 CET
From United People's Communist Party
ToDebating the Culture Act .01 2676
MessageCould I get an idea of support please?

Date21:02:58, December 06, 2008 CET
From Proletariat
ToDebating the Culture Act .01 2676
Messageabout your animal proposal...it's the animal of your party logo.
If you want we can made coin with your party leader, you like it?
If you want we can write in all our streets that your party is the best, the wonderful one you like it?
If you want we can made a new state religion, the cult of your party.

If Dorvik is in this situation, we can thanks your silly party and the stoopid reforms that you propose.

Date23:20:28, December 06, 2008 CET
From Nova Republica
ToDebating the Culture Act .01 2676
MessageWhat are your reason for changing the song or animal?

Date02:23:03, December 07, 2008 CET
From United People's Communist Party
ToDebating the Culture Act .01 2676
MessageWe are not trying to push our party ideals onto the state despite what Proletariat might think. I am trying to openly engage all users of this nation into a discussion about a mutually agreed culture adoption (for example rather then role play on yet another predominant English republic I think it would be much more exciting to adopt similar imagery/geography and a political system reflecting an under-represented nation.

There is a thread: http://www.takeforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=10068&mforum=particracy
on the forums broadly discussing possible cultures. Of course if the overwhelming majority of players decide against this (as Proletariat seemingly certainly will) we can just drop the whole thing.

(The country I was thinking for the current proposal was Russia/Ukraine based).

Date02:27:51, December 07, 2008 CET
From United People's Communist Party
ToDebating the Culture Act .01 2676
MessageIf you like the idea but have another proposal I'd probably support it.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 273

no
 

Total Seats: 108

abstain
 

Total Seats: 44


Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed).

Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 54