We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Red Dawn act for reintroduction of a defensive armed force
Details
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2684
Description[?]:
| Well, since we now are in a cooperation with other nations against the New World Order and we do have an effective antinuclear defense, I don't see why we should use nukes. Besides, in accordance with our current legislation, we don't even have nukes, so I fail to see the need to open for a nuclear retaliatory attack. As for conscription, a voluntary armed force is better. Concerning the intelligence service, just taking care of our own affairs should be enough. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Nation's policy with regards to an intelligence agency.
Old value:: The nation has an intelligence agency that is permitted by law to undertake all types of covert operations in other countries.
Current: The nation has an intelligence agency that is permitted by law to undertake all types of covert operations in other countries.
Proposed: The nation has an intelligence agency, but it is limited to counter-intelligence and surveillance of other countries.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change National service.
Old value:: All adults upon completion of schooling can be required in times of war to serve a term in the military.
Current: All adults upon completion of schooling can be required in times of war to serve a term in the military.
Proposed: There shall be no mandatory military or civilian national service.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in retaliation to any attack.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in retaliation to any attack.
Proposed: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:21:36, December 09, 2008 CET | From | New Democratic Party | To | Debating the Red Dawn act for reintroduction of a defensive armed force |
| Message | I'm the NDP and I approve of this bill. |
| Date | 14:53:35, December 09, 2008 CET | From | Bicky Forever - MSCC | To | Debating the Red Dawn act for reintroduction of a defensive armed force |
| Message | only 3 is ok for BF. |
| Date | 16:47:49, December 09, 2008 CET | From | Communist Party of Ikradon (CPI) | To | Debating the Red Dawn act for reintroduction of a defensive armed force |
| Message | We disaprove of this. |
| Date | 18:17:05, December 09, 2008 CET | From | Yellow Party | To | Debating the Red Dawn act for reintroduction of a defensive armed force |
| Message | We support this initiative. We also thank the Red Dawn for presenting an argument and not just blindly proposing legislation. |
| Date | 19:02:14, December 09, 2008 CET | From | Lyika ati Isọdọtun | To | Debating the Red Dawn act for reintroduction of a defensive armed force |
| Message | The FFP supports this bill completely. |
| Date | 21:58:40, December 09, 2008 CET | From | Bolsheviks | To | Debating the Red Dawn act for reintroduction of a defensive armed force |
| Message | We disapprove. We prefer it how its is although i might be tempted to go against conscription |
| Date | 23:34:28, December 09, 2008 CET | From | Communist Party of Ikradon (CPI) | To | Debating the Red Dawn act for reintroduction of a defensive armed force |
| Message | I wouldnt be as bothered if the defence budget was raised. Would anyone support a rise in defence? |
| Date | 00:01:31, December 10, 2008 CET | From | Red Dawn | To | Debating the Red Dawn act for reintroduction of a defensive armed force |
| Message | Red Dawn will, but we would like you to approve of this in exchange. |
| Date | 00:56:01, December 10, 2008 CET | From | Bicky Forever - MSCC | To | Debating the Red Dawn act for reintroduction of a defensive armed force |
| Message | So you want to abolish mandatory military service, but in the meantime raise the defence budget? Strange. |
| Date | 09:46:52, December 10, 2008 CET | From | Bolsheviks | To | Debating the Red Dawn act for reintroduction of a defensive armed force |
| Message | Bicky Forever, you do realise the defence budget is not just for recruiting troops? |
| Date | 09:47:35, December 10, 2008 CET | From | Bolsheviks | To | Debating the Red Dawn act for reintroduction of a defensive armed force |
| Message | To red Dawn: I will support it the article about the intelligence agency is removed |
| Date | 11:33:33, December 10, 2008 CET | From | Bicky Forever - MSCC | To | Debating the Red Dawn act for reintroduction of a defensive armed force |
| Message | What's causing the necessity of an increased defence budget then? All three this articles imply less spending expenditures. |
| Date | 12:08:48, December 10, 2008 CET | From | Red Dawn | To | Debating the Red Dawn act for reintroduction of a defensive armed force |
| Message | Well, in that case we have a deal. |
| Date | 22:29:08, December 18, 2008 CET | From | Bicky Forever - MSCC | To | Debating the Red Dawn act for reintroduction of a defensive armed force |
| Message | ok, we let it pass. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 397 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 120 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 71 |
| Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections. |
| Random quote: "Judge me all you want, just keep the verdict to yourself." - From a Winston advertisement |