Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 00:08:39
Server time: 23:51:20, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Klexi | SE33 | ShadowSneak | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Unity Cabinet Proposal of March 2682

Details

Submitted by[?]: Genuine Progress Alliance

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2682

Description[?]:

This cabinet proposal aims to unite the different parties in Aloria to help build a better nation. Previous cabinet proposals, along with voting behaviors, became the basis for this proposal.

Excluded in the proposal are the following:
- IPA, for their involvement in the NWO and the pending charges against its major leaders
- Reform Party, for its lack of activity, which might lead to the inevitable defeat of the bill if they were to be included

We need a cabinet! We need it now!

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:46:35, December 17, 2008 CET
FromAlorian Populist Party (DemCoa)
ToDebating the Unity Cabinet Proposal of March 2682
MessageIf this gets majority vote but fails to pass because a party votes against, I will propose this exact same cabinet leaving out any party that voted against. So to all parties: its this or nothing for you.

I thank the PDAP for trying to resolve the issue

Date18:46:56, December 17, 2008 CET
FromAlorian Populist Party (DemCoa)
ToDebating the Unity Cabinet Proposal of March 2682
Messageall though it appears the MLP are going inactive.

Date22:30:45, December 17, 2008 CET
FromCommunist Party of Aloria
ToDebating the Unity Cabinet Proposal of March 2682
MessageI hate it when you do this, APP.

Date22:37:28, December 17, 2008 CET
FromNationalist Party
ToDebating the Unity Cabinet Proposal of March 2682
Messagedon't like that pompous behaviour

Date22:41:55, December 17, 2008 CET
FromAlorian Populist Party (DemCoa)
ToDebating the Unity Cabinet Proposal of March 2682
MessageI don't like it when parties try to obstruct cabinet stuff even when it has support of an majority of parliament.

Date22:55:05, December 17, 2008 CET
FromCommunist Party of Aloria
ToDebating the Unity Cabinet Proposal of March 2682
MessageWe should at least discuss cabinets for a day before voting unless it's an emergency.

Date22:55:34, December 17, 2008 CET
FromConservative Union
ToDebating the Unity Cabinet Proposal of March 2682
MessageI'm not really active because I don't have internet at my home, but that will be resolved quickly. I still vote.

Date13:24:42, December 18, 2008 CET
FromGenuine Progress Alliance
ToDebating the Unity Cabinet Proposal of March 2682
MessageOOC:

The person behind MLP has confirmed to me that the MLP will be inactive already, and as such the Cabinet posts offered to them will be dormant if this bill were to be passed. I'll try to make a second version of this Cabinet proposal.

Date14:41:43, December 18, 2008 CET
FromGenuine Progress Alliance
ToDebating the Unity Cabinet Proposal of March 2682
MessageOOC:

Please go to the second draft of the proposal. An open debate is being held, so you can give out your comments.

http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=232173

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
       

Total Seats: 511

no
 

Total Seats: 114

abstain
 

Total Seats: 79


Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented

Random quote: "Perhaps the fact that we have seen millions voting themselves into complete dependence on a tyrant has made our generation understand that to choose one's government is not necessarily to secure freedom." - Friedrich Hayek

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 80