We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Constitution Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hessexian Arab Royalists
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2685
Description[?]:
Whereas the Provinces of Cisavugli, Feirano, Nicoma, Ingrisu, Teracche have expressed their desire to be federally united into One Dominion under the Crown of Royal Union of Quanzar: And whereas such a Union would conduce to the Welfare of the Provinces and promote the Interests of the Crown and the People: And whereas on the establishment of the Royal Union by authority of Parliament it is expedient, not only that the Constitution of the Legislative Authority in the nation be provided for, but also that the nature of the Executive Government therein be declared: I. PRELIMINARY 1. This Act may be cited as the Constitution Act, 2685 II. UNION 2. It shall be lawful for the Monarch, by and with the advice of His/Her Majesty's Most Honourable Privy Council and Parliament, to declare by proclamation that the Provinces of Quanzar shall form and be one Union under the name of the 'Royal Union of Quanzar'. III. PARLIAMENT 3. There shall be one Parliament for Quanzar, consisting of the Monarch and a legislative assembly, where executive power is exercised by the Lord Protector or Prime Minister and his/her ministers. 4. The Parliament shall, subject to the Provisions of this Act, consist of as many members as deemed necessary by its members, who shall be styled Members of Parliament (MPs). III. CITIES 5. The Cities of the Provinces of Quanzar shall heretofore be renamed as follows: Cisavugli - Hent - Routledge - Vaughn - Redwich - Bramsmouth Feirano - Oxbridge - Lussex - Hull - Blackwater - Kentshire Nicoma - Cavendish - Thornwall - Sudbury - Wembley - Bourne Ingrisu - Haxons - Reedingham - Berdy - Dristol - Welton Teracche - Oxfolk - Eckartshire - Hutton - Creffield - Gelford |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Structure of the executive branch.
Old value:: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Current: The Head of State is hereditary and symbolic; the Head of Government chairs the cabinet.
Proposed: The Head of State is hereditary and symbolic; the Head of Government chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The national flag (URL).
Old value:: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v716/Gepgenius81/particracy/flags/italiaviva.gif
Current: https://imgur.com/ZM2D3cv.png
Proposed: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/59/Estandarte_Imperial_de_Rusia.png
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The title of the head of government, who chairs the cabinet.
Old value:: Presidente del Consiglio
Current:
Segretario del Congresso Generale |
Proposed: Lord Protector
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The formal title of the Head of State.
Old value:: Presidente della Repubblica
Current: Segretario Generale
Proposed: Edward the first, by the Grace of God, King of Quanzar and of His other Realms and Territories, Prince of Oxfolk, Head of the House of Hessex, Defender of the Faith, etc
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The official title of the legislative assembly.
Old value:: Parlamento Istaliano
Current: Congresso Generale
Proposed: Parliament
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:38:44, December 20, 2008 CET | From | Hessexian Arab Royalists | To | Debating the Constitution Act |
Message | Make your suggestions for discussion. |
Date | 23:44:26, December 20, 2008 CET | From | Hessexian Arab Royalists | To | Debating the Constitution Act |
Message | Would anyone consider naming the country 'The Quanzarlands', similar to The Netherlands? |
Date | 00:46:32, December 21, 2008 CET | From | Rhodes Front | To | Debating the Constitution Act |
Message | Hmmm I'm not a fan of the flag tbh. |
Date | 01:49:06, December 21, 2008 CET | From | Hessexian Arab Royalists | To | Debating the Constitution Act |
Message | I just put it there because I couldn't find anything else, but we can definitely go with another flag. Here are my preferences so far: 1. Royal Union of Quanzar 2. Parliament 3. Aldurian System 4. New flag suggestion and my preference: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/59/Estandarte_Imperial_de_Rusia.png Also, please suggest some city names. |
Date | 17:56:38, December 21, 2008 CET | From | Hulstro-Trigunian Crown Alliance | To | Debating the Constitution Act |
Message | Howdy all, I'd be more then happy to make a flag for the new Monarchy in Quanzar to do my part since I can't be on the front lines with you all. Just tell me what symbols and colors you want. |
Date | 02:29:49, December 22, 2008 CET | From | Order of the Golden Crown | To | Debating the Constitution Act |
Message | We agree with the HRs most recent proposals, especially the Imperial Russian Flag. For the Head of Government title, we suggest "Lord Protector" |
Date | 06:29:21, December 22, 2008 CET | From | Hessexian Arab Royalists | To | Debating the Constitution Act |
Message | If the Imperial Russian flag is not acceptable to the Rhodesian Front then we might ask the Hulstro-Trigunian Crown Alliance to make us one. |
Date | 14:54:19, December 22, 2008 CET | From | Hulstro-Trigunian Crown Alliance | To | Debating the Constitution Act |
Message | Just tell us what you want on it and we'll do our best. |
Date | 19:04:42, December 22, 2008 CET | From | Hessexian Arab Royalists | To | Debating the Constitution Act |
Message | We have achieved 2/3. Make your last minute suggestions/opinions before I put this to a vote. |
Date | 19:26:19, December 22, 2008 CET | From | Order of the Golden Crown | To | Debating the Constitution Act |
Message | The 2/3 is sort of questionable, since we only have 66.4%, not exactly 2/3, so it may or may not work. To test it, I'll make a separate bill with article 1, "The Head of State is hereditary and symbolic; the Head of Government chairs the cabinet," which we all agree on. That way, we can know if our super-majority is really there. BTW, one slight modification "III. PARLIAMENT 3. There shall be One Parliament for Canada..." |
Date | 19:35:04, December 22, 2008 CET | From | Hessexian Arab Royalists | To | Debating the Constitution Act |
Message | Yes that has been corrected. Hmm, you're right, we might be 1 seat off... |
Date | 21:08:25, December 22, 2008 CET | From | Hulstro-Trigunian Crown Alliance | To | Debating the Constitution Act |
Message | Here's our proposal for the flag: http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/particracy/images/b/b4/Quanzari_Flag_Proposal.PNG The wreath and colors (silver and crimson) come from the last free Quanzar flag. The crown is for the monarchy. |
Date | 05:24:50, December 23, 2008 CET | From | Hessexian Arab Royalists | To | Debating the Constitution Act |
Message | Nice flag, but if the Rhodesian Front has no objections then we'll go with the Imperial Russian flag for now. This can always be changed later, the main thing now is pushing for the Anglo monarchy now that we have a supermajority. |
Date | 05:29:46, December 23, 2008 CET | From | Hessexian Arab Royalists | To | Debating the Constitution Act |
Message | Putting to a vote. Keep in mind that a lot of these can be changed later on anyways. |
Date | 05:49:09, December 23, 2008 CET | From | Rhodes Front | To | Debating the Constitution Act |
Message | How about changing the name of the nation to anything less Italian than it currently is. |
Date | 05:50:34, December 23, 2008 CET | From | Hessexian Arab Royalists | To | Debating the Constitution Act |
Message | You oppose 'Royal Union of Quanzar'? |
Date | 06:12:33, December 23, 2008 CET | From | Rhodes Front | To | Debating the Constitution Act |
Message | I'd prefer Royal Union of Quanzari. |
Date | 06:28:33, December 23, 2008 CET | From | Hessexian Arab Royalists | To | Debating the Constitution Act |
Message | Isn't Quanzari the demonym (i.e. what we call people who live in Quanzar)? |
Date | 06:42:44, December 23, 2008 CET | From | Order of the Golden Crown | To | Debating the Constitution Act |
Message | That's what I thought. I've been using "Quanzaran," just because I like the sound better. |
Date | 10:12:49, December 23, 2008 CET | From | Partito Repubblicano Conservatore | To | Debating the Constitution Act |
Message | you behaved like our president (berlusconi) |
Date | 17:35:58, December 23, 2008 CET | From | Hessexian Arab Royalists | To | Debating the Constitution Act |
Message | Isn't Berlusconi a prime minister? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 405 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 194 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation. |
Random quote: "It is never too late to give up our prejudices." - Henry David Thoreau |