We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: weaponary at home
Details
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2700
Description[?]:
| i think that all families must have a weapon locked away incase of an attack on the home or a threat from a strange person this will help the people of our nation stay protected and right |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the export of weapons to other nations.
Old value:: The government must approve all arms sales on a case by case basis.
Current: The government must approve all arms sales on a case by case basis.
Proposed: The government allows arms to be sold only to close allies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:43:18, January 19, 2009 CET | From |  Federal Alliance | To | Debating the weaponary at home |
| Message | you cant spell |
| Date | 23:45:43, January 19, 2009 CET | From | Kébé Front | To | Debating the weaponary at home |
| Message | Yes, no, Yes. |
| Date | 02:35:12, January 20, 2009 CET | From | Progressive Conservative Party | To | Debating the weaponary at home |
| Message | The Conservative Party would like to remind the Federal Alliance that slander use against a party is a poor reflection on one's own party. In response to the bill: Article One: The Conservative Party does not believe that the National Military should interfere with domestic police forces. The local police forces should be sufficiently trained and funded to deal with most typical situations. Only in serious emergencies should the military be called in. Article Two: It is our belief that nuclear technology not be used for military purposes; it is a crude and destructive weapon that need not be used. However, if we are attacked by such a weapon, it is only fair that we retaliate likewise. Therefore, we approve nuclear weapons as a last resort tactic against our foes, and should only have a limited stockpile; the rest of the material should be used for economic purposes. Article Three: The Conservative Party does not have a statement on the trade of arms to foreign nations at this time. Overall, if this were to come to a vote, it would be a no from here. |
| Date | 22:56:25, January 20, 2009 CET | From | jet Party | To | Debating the weaponary at home |
| Message | thank you for your comments i have removed the second proposal and hope that will interest you |
| Date | 02:21:39, January 21, 2009 CET | From | Progressive Conservative Party | To | Debating the weaponary at home |
| Message | Is it possible to move this to a vote? |
| Date | 21:47:40, January 21, 2009 CET | From | jet Party | To | Debating the weaponary at home |
| Message | yes |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 75 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed). |
| Random quote: "The whole uncivilized bunch on the opposite benches can get stuffed." - Craig Warwick, former Dranian politician |