We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Reformation Bil
Details
Submitted by[?]: Communist Party of Aloria
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2721
Description[?]:
| WE'RE BACK! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Racial segregation of public amenities (eg. drinking fountains, public toilets)
Old value:: Government owned amenities are not segregated, private organisations are free to choose.
Current: Segregation of any public amenity is banned.
Proposed: Segregation of any public amenity is banned.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on sexual relations.
Old value:: Sexual relation laws are set by local governments.
Current: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Proposed: Sexual relations of all types are legal for consenting adults.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:41:15, February 09, 2009 CET | From | New Socialist Alliance | To | Debating the Reformation Bil |
| Message | ABOUT BLOODY TIME! |
| Date | 00:52:46, February 09, 2009 CET | From | Independent Radical List | To | Debating the Reformation Bil |
| Message | Hi comrades, nice to meet you. Good bill by the way. |
| Date | 01:06:58, February 09, 2009 CET | From | New Aloria Party (NAP) | To | Debating the Reformation Bil |
| Message | I'm glad this still in debate. Article 1 I do support. However I need a point of clarification on Article 2, if passed would a sexual relation between an adult and a minor be allowed? |
| Date | 02:21:27, February 09, 2009 CET | From | Independent Radical List | To | Debating the Reformation Bil |
| Message | re. article 2 - it refers to consenting adults so no it would not allow paedophilia |
| Date | 03:34:27, February 09, 2009 CET | From | New Aloria Party (NAP) | To | Debating the Reformation Bil |
| Message | Than I shall support this. |
| Date | 23:09:27, February 09, 2009 CET | From | Conservative Union | To | Debating the Reformation Bil |
| Message | Article 1 is anti-freedom Article 2 I'm neutral on |
| Date | 13:45:25, February 10, 2009 CET | From | Independent Radical List | To | Debating the Reformation Bil |
| Message | CU, Article 1 might reduce the freedom of racists to discriminate, however it increases the freedom of those who are oppressed and discriminated against. The question is not whether this conflicts with your abstract notion of freedom, but whose side are you on? |
| Date | 13:46:56, February 10, 2009 CET | From | Independent Radical List | To | Debating the Reformation Bil |
| Message | BTW, is this going to a vote soon, I'd like to see these vital laws passed. |
| Date | 23:47:12, March 05, 2009 CET | From | New Aloria Party (NAP) | To | Debating the Reformation Bil |
| Message | APP, we could usr you're help |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 307 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 443 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In order for a Cabinet bill to pass, more than half of the legislature must vote for it and all of the parties included in the proposed Cabinet must support it. If your nation has a Head of State who is also the Head of Government, then the party controlling this character must also vote for the bill, since the Head of Government is also a member of the Cabinet. If any of these requirements are not met, the bill will not pass. |
| Random quote: "A leader has the vision and conviction that a dream can be achieved. He inspires the power and energy to get it done." - Ralph Nader |