Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 03:07:22
Server time: 20:52:37, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): burgerboys | hexaus18 | hexaus19 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Jakanian Military Strength Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: J00ishAlliance

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2125

Description[?]:

This bill increases Jakanian military strength.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:31:12, October 12, 2005 CET
FromJakanian Conservative Party
ToDebating the Jakanian Military Strength Act
MessageTo the NP, we need nukes for defense, since several other nations have nuclear weopons, it is only prudent to have them ourselves.

Date08:25:53, October 12, 2005 CET
FromJakanian Liberal Socialists
ToDebating the Jakanian Military Strength Act
MessageNuclear weapons are far too expensive to maintain, and with article 1 as it is, this bill seems more like an attempt to have nuclear weapons used as a preemptive attack method rather than as a defencive deterrent against other nuclear nations.

The JLSP does not support this bill in any form, and does not condone this form of decent into military barbarism. Just because another does something doesn't mean we have to sink as low as they do, and we find such an attitude petty and contrary to what is best for United Jakania.

Date21:02:39, October 12, 2005 CET
From Islamic Nationalist Front
ToDebating the Jakanian Military Strength Act
MessageThe LP shares the LSP's concern. Nuclear weapons do not discriminate between enemy militants and civilians, thus, resulting in an unnecessary loss of human life should they be used. Nuclear warfare is also environmentally detrimental. However, banning all nuclear arms is dangerous. Even international agreements to prohibit use of nuclear arms do not necessarily secure United Jakania against potential nuclear attacks. In such scenarios, there is little accountability as only the government in each country really knows how many weapons the country possesses. Countries could easily feign disarmament, while secretly holding onto any number of nuclear arms. Thus, the ability to develop nuclear weapons and *use* them is inevitably necessary to counterbalance the potential threat from other nations. Furthermore, we'd like to note that any appeals from the LSP on the grounds of excessive government expenditure are blatantly hypocritical following its push to socialize most of United Jakania's industries.

Date22:20:22, October 12, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic Labour Union
ToDebating the Jakanian Military Strength Act
MessageThe Democratic Labour Union concurs with the Jakanian Libertarian Party in that Mutually Assured Deterrent albeit distasteful, regrettably remains necessary.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 94

no
  

Total Seats: 131

abstain
   

Total Seats: 25


Random fact: When you join the game, you will find yourself with only zero seats. That's because your party's representatives haven't been elected yet. You need to establish your party's position on issues by proposing several bills that your party wants passed and sending them to vote. This raises your visibility and if you do it enough, you will win seats at the next election.

Random quote: "Wherever you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship." - Harry S. Truman

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 65