Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 01:50:04
Server time: 22:09:55, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): burgerboys | hexaus18 | hexaus19 | HopesFor | JourneyJak | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Worker's Freedom Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Anarchist Workers Federation (IAF)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2714

Description[?]:

We must end all restrictions on the actions of the working class in defence of their interests

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:25:38, February 16, 2009 CET
FromRutanian Heritage Party
ToDebating the Worker's Freedom Bill
MessageWe cannot agree to this - disproportionate union power over businesses allows for exploitation and unreasonable demands, and distorts the economy. We see no need for these excessive proposals - any disputes between workers and their employers can be resolved through individual discussion, and, if they cannot, the most effective option for workers is to resign and find more suibtable employment elsewhere.

Date13:56:42, February 16, 2009 CET
FromRutanian Restoration Party
ToDebating the Worker's Freedom Bill
MessageWe cannot support this bill because we believe that workers should hold a ballot before striking. The whole point of a union is microdemocracy in action. We do support Article 2.

Date15:31:19, February 16, 2009 CET
FromRutanian Elitist Party
ToDebating the Worker's Freedom Bill
MessageThe REP would support the Article 1 and 2, because it would increase liberties, but as the representatives of the OP pointed out, the abolition of microdemocratic mechanism within trade unions makes Article 3 unacceptable.

Date17:08:48, February 16, 2009 CET
FromNational Equality Party
ToDebating the Worker's Freedom Bill
MessageWe at the NEP will not support this bill. We already fought a bill changing the workers right to strike. And unions should require a majority vote. If only a minority wish to strike and they can because of this bill, the majority are left tempoarily out of work.

Date05:38:09, February 17, 2009 CET
FromNational Unity Party
ToDebating the Worker's Freedom Bill
MessageThe NUP will not support this bill for the obvious reason that the people's right to work will not be acknowledged in this bill.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
      

Total Seats: 699

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368

    Random quote: "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting that vote." - Unknown

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 76