Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5575
Next month in: 02:26:24
Server time: 13:33:35, November 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): roskis | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The Self Preservation Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Crimson Moon Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2717

Description[?]:

This bill is to allow any adult without a dangerouse criminal history to own a gun. This will allow people to better protect their. This is also expected to reduce crime by preventing home invasion.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:21:21, February 25, 2009 CET
FromCrimson Moon Party
ToDebating the The Self Preservation Act
MessageSince only specially trained police forces can carry weapons Crimson Moon Party believes it is only right to give people the right to protect themselves from those who don't obey the gun laws. Also this will help keep the guns out of lawbreakers hands. We believe this will drastically lower crime. Who wants to break into a house when the owner is likely to have a gun?

Date13:10:30, February 25, 2009 CET
FromNew Democratic Party
ToDebating the The Self Preservation Act
MessageSo we're promoting vigilantism now? And how exactly would allowing everyone to have guns "keep guns out of lawbreakers' hands"?

Date01:52:46, February 26, 2009 CET
FromCrimson Moon Party
ToDebating the The Self Preservation Act
MessageWe are not allowing criminals to purchase guns. We all know they get them anyway so what will we achieve from keeping it out of law obiding citizens hands? We are not promoting vigilantism but simply self defense. Few police officers are allowed to carry weapons of lethat force and if civilians aren't then what are you to do if a man with a gun comes into your home? Action must be taken to protect our people and I believe sufficient action has yet to occur.

Date12:18:28, February 26, 2009 CET
FromNew Democratic Party
ToDebating the The Self Preservation Act
MessageThat's why the police have firearms squads. If you don't have lots of guns out there, the number of times someone threatens you with a gun is also going to be less.

Furthermore, let me point out that people with convictions for "non-violent" offences can still obtain guns under this legislation.

Date14:17:05, February 26, 2009 CET
FromFederal Capitalist Union (CC-DMF)
ToDebating the The Self Preservation Act
MessageWhat is the average response time of police in Ikradon. Now, how much longer will it take for the firearm squad to get there.

The answer is, TOO LONG!

Date16:07:34, February 26, 2009 CET
FromCrimson Moon Party
ToDebating the The Self Preservation Act
MessageThis is our stance on the matter.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 103

no
    

Total Seats: 597

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Real-life religions should not be referenced in Particracy. Terra has its own religions, many of which mirror real-life ones. See: http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Illustrated_Catalogue_of_Religion

Random quote: "Those looking for ideology in the White House should consider this: for the men who rule our world, rules are for other people." - Naomi Klein

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 57