We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Individual Sovereignty Act of 2717
Details
Submitted by[?]: House Lusk-Nat'l Syndicalist Party (UM)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2718
Description[?]:
This act will end compulsory organ donation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning organ donations.
Old value:: Organ donation is universal and compulsory.
Current: Unless otherwise stated, consent is assumed.
Proposed: Unless otherwise stated, consent is assumed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 06:15:11, February 26, 2009 CET | From | Union of Radical Republicans (UM) | To | Debating the Individual Sovereignty Act of 2717 |
Message | While we believe this bill is a step in the right direction from the current policy that fails to respect even the single unit of the nation, the sanctity of the individual citizen, it does not move far enough from the oppressions of our past. How can this government claim to represent all the people if they continue to assume their consent? It cannot. Consent must be given by the individual for their actions, even in death. |
Date | 22:52:22, February 26, 2009 CET | From | Liberal-Democratic Party | To | Debating the Individual Sovereignty Act of 2717 |
Message | No one should have the right to deny another the right to live without cost to themselves. |
Date | 00:21:20, February 27, 2009 CET | From | Roccato Anarcho-Syndicalist Union | To | Debating the Individual Sovereignty Act of 2717 |
Message | Whether or not corpse mutilation is a cost for the victim is a theological argument. It ought to be left up to individuals to decide. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 426 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 264 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 60 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "[The people] may forget what you said, but they will never forget how you made them feel." - Carl W. Buechner |