Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 00:09:19
Server time: 23:50:40, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Klexi | SE33 | ShadowSneak | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Food Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Roccato Anarcho-Syndicalist Union

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2720

Description[?]:

This bill will put more food on the shelves in these hungry, hungry times.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:51:06, March 02, 2009 CET
FromHouse Lusk-Nat'l Syndicalist Party (UM)
ToDebating the Food Act
MessageBut if it should kill for being spoilt?

Date15:54:55, March 02, 2009 CET
FromRoccato Anarcho-Syndicalist Union
ToDebating the Food Act
MessageYou have so little faith in the ability of our local councilmen?

Date17:13:13, March 02, 2009 CET
FromPopulist Party
ToDebating the Food Act
MessageIt seems as though you're trying to destabilize Athlorcaea and create a sort of union of autonomous states. This will only lead to instability, inefficiency, and could even lead to a civil war.

Date17:57:07, March 02, 2009 CET
FromRoccato Anarcho-Syndicalist Union
ToDebating the Food Act
MessageThis is a bill about the decentralization of food regulation. The RASU does not think that bureaucrats in Adrianopolis know what is best for all the workers through Athlorcaea. This bill would not destabilize the state in anyway and would similarly contribute in no wise to civil war. The NPP's rhetoric is fear-mongering, pure and simple.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 58

no
       

Total Seats: 692

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play.

    Random quote: "Our greatest glory is not in never falling, but in rising every time we fall." - Confucius

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 60