Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5477
Next month in: 00:08:46
Server time: 23:51:13, April 30, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): ADM Drax | Infinite | R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Fire Protection Federalization Act of 2371

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social Federalist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2731

Description[?]:

Fire protection is best handled by local governments. Less bureaucracy, more efficient, closer to the local populace.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date16:01:19, March 25, 2009 CET
FromRoccato Anarcho-Syndicalist Union
ToDebating the Fire Protection Federalization Act of 2371
MessageConsidering that this is basically a reversal of a bill already passed by this assembly, the RASU does not see how it might be expected to pass. Nevertheless, we support.

Date16:40:56, March 25, 2009 CET
FromFederalist Minarcho-Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Fire Protection Federalization Act of 2371
MessageThe AP supports as well. The AP reminds the RASU that the LPHGM is no longer weighing in on the issue.

Date17:54:22, March 25, 2009 CET
FromModern Revolutionary Socialist Party
ToDebating the Fire Protection Federalization Act of 2371
MessagePlease explain the logic that local means more efficient and less bureaucratic.

Date18:30:55, March 25, 2009 CET
FromSocial Federalist Party
ToDebating the Fire Protection Federalization Act of 2371
MessageHaving locals run their own fire departments means that FDs will be more familiar and in touch with the communities they serve, ensuring overall smoother operation. Less red tape to go through for requisition/procurement, decisions will be made by those more familiar with the situation 'on the ground', etc.

Date20:45:16, March 25, 2009 CET
FromRoccato Anarcho-Syndicalist Union
ToDebating the Fire Protection Federalization Act of 2371
MessageThe AP should be aware that the LPHGM was on our side — that is, opposed — in the earlier bill. Without their support, we are even less likely to succeed. However, we recognize that accurate memory of the political record is not one of the AP's strong suits.

Date23:22:51, March 25, 2009 CET
FromFederalist Minarcho-Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Fire Protection Federalization Act of 2371
MessageThe AP thanks the RASU for reminding them of the position of LPHGM, and would like further aid remembering a specific part of the political record, specifically, how many of the RASU's proposals have been approved in the past year compared to the number of the AP's proposals approved in the last year?

Date02:24:18, March 26, 2009 CET
FromRoccato Anarcho-Syndicalist Union
ToDebating the Fire Protection Federalization Act of 2371
MessageThe matter hardly seems relevant to the bill at hand. In any event, the voters of Athlorcaea are the ultimate judges of our proposals, and we will hear from them in a few short months.

Date21:44:24, March 26, 2009 CET
FromFederalist Minarcho-Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Fire Protection Federalization Act of 2371
MessageThe people have spoken.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 234

no
   

Total Seats: 364

abstain
 

Total Seats: 84


Random fact: Cabinet ministers who disagree seriously with the head of government would usually be expected to resign. Parties within the cabinet may attempt to manoeuvre to replace the head of government though, for example by proposing a new cabinet bill or voting for an early election.

Random quote: "A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." - George Washington

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64