We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Judiciary Integration Act of 2731 (JIA)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Federalist Minarcho-Capitalist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2732
Description[?]:
| This bill seeks to add a final level of appeals process to protect the citizens of the FSA from violations of their rights by the national or local governments. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the administration of law.
Old value:: There are regional courts that have jurisdiction over questions of regional law and national courts that have jurisdiction over questions of national law.
Current: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Proposed: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:52:46, March 26, 2009 CET | From | Roccato Anarcho-Syndicalist Union | To | Debating the Judiciary Integration Act of 2731 (JIA) |
| Message | The RASU opposes any expansion of the role of federal courts. |
| Date | 12:17:15, March 27, 2009 CET | From | Modern Revolutionary Socialist Party | To | Debating the Judiciary Integration Act of 2731 (JIA) |
| Message | We would support. |
| Date | 16:47:04, March 27, 2009 CET | From | Social Federalist Party | To | Debating the Judiciary Integration Act of 2731 (JIA) |
| Message | Regional courts adjudicate on matters of regional law, national courts on those of national law. Where they come into conflict...ugh, we really need a constitution. Opposing, for now. |
| Date | 16:49:41, March 27, 2009 CET | From | Social Federalist Party | To | Debating the Judiciary Integration Act of 2731 (JIA) |
| Message | Actually, supporting, but very hesitantly. We really need some kind of constitution do delineate exactly when and why national courts can take up formerly regional cases. Hell, we need regional legislatures to even make this an issue, so why not. |
| Date | 21:41:06, March 27, 2009 CET | From | Roccato Anarcho-Syndicalist Union | To | Debating the Judiciary Integration Act of 2731 (JIA) |
| Message | The RASU points out that we have a constitution; it is just very poorly written. And we do have local councils that would qualify as "regional legislatures." |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 562 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 188 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368 |
| Random quote: "They can call us communists and fascists all they want but, their words are of a hollow ring with the blood of innocence at their feet." - Mathew Jameson, former Hutorian politician |