Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5476
Next month in: 00:15:17
Server time: 11:44:42, April 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (9): burgerboys | echizen | Freemarket21 | GLNBei | JVTA | LC73DunMHP | Moderation | rezins | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of March 2128

Details

Submitted by[?]: Freedom Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2129

Description[?]:

This has been proposed in case the other one does not pass as i believe the Conservatives wanted HoG

I have given them that. took away Justice, gave that to the LIP and took away Finance gave it to me. I gave up HoG to Conservatives

Gave CP environment as they care about that more than the rest of us do ;-)

Gave CDP Trade and Industry as requested, HS &S from Conservatives,

LIP have been given education as well as Transport

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:06:29, October 20, 2005 CET
FromCivic Democratic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2128
MessageFine by me, whatever works.

Date19:40:18, October 20, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2128
MessageWhat exactly is an arrangement that would suit you CP?

Date19:45:45, October 20, 2005 CET
From Freedom Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2128
MessageRFP

I said "Sounds good" About preferential partners while we were discussing a deal, you then placed the RSDP second to the CDP and ahead of the CP and LIP. At which point i said no way to that and thus no deal was agreed as i would not abandon the Conservatives or the LIP permanently or for more than one freak election. You also said you dont like the Conservatives and have been quite clear about it to me.

Date20:19:24, October 20, 2005 CET
FromCivic Democratic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2128
MessageSeriously why wont the Conservatives agree to any cabinet? This gives them what they wanted but they still protest? Are they trying to keep a government from forming? Are they trying to filibuster the formation of a working government?

Date21:43:52, October 20, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of March 2128
MessageOr I clicked the wrong little button. :p


If I was grandstanding, I'd let you know.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 353

no
  

Total Seats: 112

abstain
   

Total Seats: 48


Random fact: In Particracy players are only allowed to play as one party at a time. Want to swap nations? Inactivate your current party and make a new one! Want to return? Request Moderation to reactivate your party on the forum!

Random quote: "If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual [gay] sex within your home, then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything!" - Rick Santorum

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 56