We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of February 2792
Details
Submitted by[?]: Sue's Corner
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2792
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
As per the Constitution, the President chairs the cabinet.
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the 
New Centre and Unionists
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the New Centre and Unionists
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Meritocratic Alliance
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Meritocratic Alliance
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Sue's Corner
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the New Centre and Unionists
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the New Centre and Unionists
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Sue's Corner
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the People's Liberation Army of Solentia
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the People's Liberation Army of Solentia
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Sue's Corner
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Sue's Corner
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:30:18, July 25, 2009 CET | From | Sue's Corner | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2792 |
| Message | We believe this is the right balance of parties from the senate. We have a mixture of parties and a broad range of opinion making up a cabinet of all the talents. I believe we have the four parties here in cabinet, who care most about democracy, most about constitutional changes and making real progressive change for the good of Soletnia. We hope all these 4 parites support our bid. Wilfred Churchil, Supreme President/VRP Leader. |
| Date | 18:42:24, July 25, 2009 CET | From | Conservative Party of Solentia | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2792 |
| Message | A ridiculous display of lack of respect by the 'Supreme President.' Your party voted no on both of Education Minister Sonia Le'Croix's necessary educational reform packages, and now you want the seat to yourself? The VRP is the second smallest party in Solentia, obviously not supported by the citizens, and yet you still see yourselves as equals to the SRNP, the Centrists, and better than the SHP? Once again a VRP move disrupts Solentian government. We ask the honorable men in the SRNP to rescind their support for this cabinet and ask that the PLAS and Centrists do not vote yes on this ridiculous bill! Andrew Thomas SHP Chairman |
| Date | 19:48:19, July 25, 2009 CET | From | New Centre and Unionists | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2792 |
| Message | "The Solentian Centrist Coalition is alarmed somewhat by the absence of the SHP and FIP in these proposals. We therefore, must decline." |
| Date | 21:01:59, July 25, 2009 CET | From | Sue's Corner | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2792 |
| Message | We are working to try and get all parties into our cabinet now, or at least as many as possible. But the Centrists only had 3 parties in their previous cabinet we must point out, |
| Date | 23:33:47, July 25, 2009 CET | From | New Centre and Unionists | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2792 |
| Message | "Indeed however we did attempt several much more representative cabinets first. We also ensured that smaller parties were not placed higher in preference than larger parties. The VRP and Centrists are both small than the FIP and SHP and yet the two of them recieve less seats in cabinet." |
| Date | 23:48:24, July 25, 2009 CET | From | Sue's Corner | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2792 |
| Message | Point taken, but I do need the cooperation of you all on this. I will try and get as many in cabinet as possible. But I need you all to promise that you will support me and try to cooperate on this. |
| Date | 01:10:34, July 26, 2009 CET | From | Meritocratic Alliance | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2792 |
| Message | Putting the FIP in a cabinet is a mistake. They reject all cabinets of late in which they dot rule over. They seem to prefer to appoint pretend cabinets instead. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 125 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 226 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 74 |
| Random fact: You can view helpful ideological statistics about the regions in your nation on the region pages. You can also view detailed political opinions and the importance of them there as well. |
| Random quote: "Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber." - Plato |