Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 03:11:55
Server time: 04:48:04, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: First Religious Reforms

Details

Submitted by[?]: Solentian Independence Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2795

Description[?]:

"The Churches should be bestowed the rights to regulate adulthood, but should in turn be open to other faiths. This is the will of the people!"

- Eustace Ali Wrightward

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:52:47, August 01, 2009 CET
From Conservative Party of Solentia
ToDebating the First Religious Reforms
MessageMr. Wrightward,

You claim this bill to be the will of the people, but what do you know of the people? You religious types are all the same, spreading your falsities and illusions of freedom. The Solentian man, ensnared and confused by so many teachings of salvation and morality, will begin to lose the freedoms and place their lives into the hands of smooth talking preachers, who rather than hoping for growth of the citizens are inhibiting it; who rather than helping are harming. Morality is a human, not a theological, habit, Mr. Wrightward.

Adam Holt
Senate Warden of Solentia, SWDL Chairman

Date04:16:34, August 01, 2009 CET
From Meritocratic Alliance
ToDebating the First Religious Reforms
MessageThis is a schizo bill. It is against and yet for religion.

ooc: this kind of bill only ends up putting everyone into a nearly equal footing, which is pointless.

Date04:35:02, August 01, 2009 CET
From Solentian Independence Party
ToDebating the First Religious Reforms
MessageMr. Holt,

First off, it's Doctor Wrightward. I am not much for religion, I almost never attend Church. I believe that religion should be encouraged, but only as a social activity. I more than agree with you on all points, however I believe that adulthood should not be determined by a number. I have been one of the people all my life and I know what my fellow man is asking for. My fellow man is asking for religion.

Dr. Eustace Ali Wrightward
MPS Chairman

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 107

no
    

Total Seats: 241

abstain
  

Total Seats: 77


Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI).

Random quote: "The secret of freedom lies in educating people, whereas the secret of tyranny is in keeping them ignorant." - Maximilien Robespierre

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64