We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Pro-Family Bill of September 2131
Details
Submitted by[?]: Parti Monarchiste Catholique
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2133
Description[?]:
| Honourable Colleagues, The traditional family is the cornerstone of our society. Today, we see that the traditional family is under assualt from all sides. In order to prevent the complete breakdown of one of our most sacred institutions, we wish to propose legislation that would encourage traditional families, and discourge other types of lifestyles. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning who can proceed with adoption; in case adoption is legal.
Old value:: Everyone may adopt children.
Current: Everyone may adopt children.
Proposed: Only heterosexual couples may adopt children.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy toward marriage.
Old value:: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Current: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Proposed: The government only recognises civil marriages between a man and a woman.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:03:44, October 27, 2005 CET | From | Union for the Rights of Christian Women | To | Debating the Pro-Family Bill of September 2131 |
| Message | With the second we agree but the first we would rather leave it as it is. |
| Date | 14:57:53, October 27, 2005 CET | From | Serenity Party | To | Debating the Pro-Family Bill of September 2131 |
| Message | I oppose this as it is a violation of rights. |
| Date | 17:44:06, October 27, 2005 CET | From |  Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the Pro-Family Bill of September 2131 |
| Message | Honorable members of the CMP, We wish to question you about the two articles proposed by your party. Concering article 1: Can you ratify your proposal, in any way, that 'non-heterosexual' couples are not able to raise a child properly? Concerning article 2: Marriage for the state and/or church are still 2 seperated matters - for church, spiritual and symbolic. for the state, administrative and 'symbolic' - so what you're asking here is for 'two people' not having the possibility to contract a marriage agreement? |
| Date | 07:01:23, October 28, 2005 CET | From | Parti Monarchiste Catholique | To | Debating the Pro-Family Bill of September 2131 |
| Message | Article 1: It seems obvious that children need parents of both genders in order to develop properly. Having two mommie or two daddies removes an important element from the process. Article 2: Yes, I am proposing that the government not issue marriage licenses to homosexual couples. |
| Date | 12:21:40, October 28, 2005 CET | From | Mouvement des Conservateurs | To | Debating the Pro-Family Bill of September 2131 |
| Message | There is no prove on proposition 1 - that children who are being raised by a homosexual suffer from any shortcomings. We oppose this act. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 32 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 28 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 29 |
| Random fact: Never use the same password as a friend. If two or more active accounts use the same password, they will be inactivated. |
| Random quote: "The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution." - Hannah Arendt |