We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Public Safety
Details
Submitted by[?]: Deadly Buzz Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2135
Description[?]:
| If the public is at risk then a demonstration must be stopped. We cannot risk the health/lives of our people just because somebody wants to prove a point. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The citizens' right to assemble in public.
Old value:: There are no restrictions on the right of citizens to assemble in groups.
Current: There are no restrictions on the right of citizens to assemble in groups.
Proposed: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:27:14, October 31, 2005 CET | From | Alliance for Natural Law | To | Debating the Public Safety |
| Message | No. |
| Date | 12:41:09, October 31, 2005 CET | From | Deadly Buzz Party | To | Debating the Public Safety |
| Message | May I ask why? If a demonstration starts turning into a riot should it be allowed turn into a riot, or should it be ended before it developes to that level? |
| Date | 05:38:26, November 01, 2005 CET | From | Alliance for Natural Law | To | Debating the Public Safety |
| Message | Two words: "believe" "potential" |
| Date | 12:35:11, November 01, 2005 CET | From | Deadly Buzz Party | To | Debating the Public Safety |
| Message | -Two words: "believe" "potential" Exactly, and if the police dont "believe" that there is "potential" for trouble then it will carry on. I'd rather be safe then sorry. If someone slipped in with a bomb and the police got information, then why should they be powerless to stop it |
| Date | 02:08:35, November 02, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberty Party | To | Debating the Public Safety |
| Message | They could say "Someone has a bomb, everyone who doesn't want to die in a fiery explosion may want to leave." And attempt to apprehend the person with the bomb |
| Date | 11:49:57, November 02, 2005 CET | From | Deadly Buzz Party | To | Debating the Public Safety |
| Message | -They could say "Someone has a bomb, everyone who doesn't want to die in a fiery explosion may want to leave." And attempt to apprehend the person with the bomb- If you announced to the crowd that someone had a bomb, will they all leave peacefully? Of course not. It'd be chaos. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 87 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 114 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: When your party holds the foreign affairs department, you can create new treaties. However, before writing anything new, it is a good idea to search for existing treaties which already accomplish what you desire. |
| Random quote: "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." - Ed Howdershelt |