Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5475
Next month in: 01:50:20
Server time: 14:09:39, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Infinite | JWDL | Probax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Early Childhood Education Act of 2879

Details

Submitted by[?]: Union of Radical Republicans (UM)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2880

Description[?]:

This act will bring into agreement early childhood educational systems and normal schooling, as they must be considered part of the same continuum.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:56:07, January 17, 2010 CET
FromConservative-Libertarian Party (UM)
ToDebating the Early Childhood Education Act of 2879
MessageMr Speaker, for the moment we believe that the private sector is doing a good job of providing pre-school education.

Date19:12:22, January 17, 2010 CET
FromUnion of Radical Republicans (UM)
ToDebating the Early Childhood Education Act of 2879
MessageBut why? This implies that early childhood education is not necessary for a child's intellectual development when all research points to the opposite. We already subsidize it; why not afford it the same importance as traditional education?

Date20:07:37, January 17, 2010 CET
FromConservative-Libertarian Party (UM)
ToDebating the Early Childhood Education Act of 2879
MessageMr Speaker, it does not imply that early education is not important. On the other hand, it implies that the private sector is best able to deliver such education. This is where the republicans slip up, by equating importance with the activities of the state.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 161

no
   

Total Seats: 190

abstain
 

Total Seats: 40


Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar).

Random quote: "If we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people to not kill each other? Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what they want." - Mother Teresa of Calcutta quotes

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 49