We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Law Reform
Details
Submitted by[?]: Telamon Liberal Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2893
Description[?]:
Reforming many different laws in Telamon |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards alcoholic beverages.
Old value:: Alcoholic beverages may be purchased only from licensed sales outlets, but consumed by anyone.
Current: Alcoholic beverages may be purchased only from licensed sales outlets, and can only be available to adults.
Proposed: Alcoholic beverages may be purchased only from licensed sales outlets, and can only be available to adults.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Proposed: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government position in respect to crossdressing policy.
Old value:: Local governments determine the legality of crossdressing.
Current: Crossdressing is allowed.
Proposed: The government has no policy concerning crossdressing.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Government policy with respect to the death penalty.
Old value:: The death penalty is applied for capital crimes.
Current: The death penalty is illegal and is never to be applied.
Proposed: The death penalty is illegal and is never to be applied.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change Government-issued identity card policy.
Old value:: Citizens are issued with identity cards on a voluntary basis.
Current: All citizens are issued with identity cards but are not required to carry them.
Proposed: All citizens are issued with identity cards but are not required to carry them.
Article 6
Proposal[?] to change The government's stance on a salary cap.
Old value:: The government enforces a salary cap.
Current: The government enforces a salary cap.
Proposed: The government has no stance on a salary cap.
Article 7
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning organ donations.
Old value:: Unless otherwise stated, consent is assumed.
Current: Organ donation is universal and compulsory.
Proposed: Organ donations are legal with personal consent.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:03:30, February 09, 2010 CET | From | Aggressive Communist Party | To | Debating the Law Reform |
Message | i think i would vote no but i just did a skim |
Date | 09:04:15, February 10, 2010 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Law Reform |
Message | I would vote yes. |
Date | 12:54:30, February 10, 2010 CET | From | Telamon Liberal Party | To | Debating the Law Reform |
Message | I have chosen to reform the main laws that I think Telamon should change in order for more democracy and freedom to the people. For example, crossdressing is a right that people should have if they want it. However, I have requested that all citizens must carry an ID card due to security reasons, and that alcohol should only consumed by adults as alcohol can do great harm to kids and young people. |
Date | 16:40:09, February 10, 2010 CET | From | Telamon Nationellpartiet-Republikansk | To | Debating the Law Reform |
Message | I will be voting No to this, there is not 1 redeeming feature to this BIll |
Date | 18:42:44, February 10, 2010 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Law Reform |
Message | I agree with the Telamon Liberal Party. While I personally find crossdressing distasteful, it is the citizens right to choose whether or not he/she chooses to do so. The government should have no say in personal lives of Citizens. |
Date | 12:29:28, February 11, 2010 CET | From | Telamon Liberal Party | To | Debating the Law Reform |
Message | Well, TNP, will you can to explain why you do not like my bill? And what refoms do you think is suitable for Telamon? |
Date | 17:38:11, February 11, 2010 CET | From | Conservative Ordo Malleus (COM) | To | Debating the Law Reform |
Message | Why are people so concerned about crossdressing? Is there a national epidemic of repressed crossdressers taking their lives because they're being disallowed from crossdressing? I mean really... |
Date | 20:44:32, February 12, 2010 CET | From | Democratic Capitalist Delegation | To | Debating the Law Reform |
Message | Due to Article IV, we must oppose this legislation. Carl Ramon Chairman Democratic Capitalist Delegation |
Date | 20:59:46, February 12, 2010 CET | From | Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Law Reform |
Message | COM If the government wasn't concerned about Crossdressing it wouldn't have implemented this law in the first place. Its not that there is an epidemic, its the fact that the Government would even consider denying a person a personal right. If the government can do that then why not let the government assign us all uniforms. No, the way a person dresses is their own decision, not the governments. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 60 | |||
no | Total Seats: 301 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 139 |
Random fact: Any RP law granting extraordinary "emergency powers" or dictator-like powers to a government must be passed by at least a 2/3rds majority, but (like all RP laws) may always be overturned by a simple majority vote of the legislature. |
Random quote: "I think it's about time we voted for senators with breasts. After all, we've been voting for boobs long enough." - Clarie Sargent |