We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Agricultural Reform October 2899
Details
Submitted by[?]: The Progressive Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2901
Description[?]:
The Federal Governement must not set regulations at a standard for all farmers across the nation to be held too. All conditions are different across our land and these desicions can be made more appropriatly by the local governments where Farmers can address their concerns to ensure the best quality of food for the people of Indrala. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning farm size.
Old value:: Small farms are encouraged to merge together into larger ones.
Current: Farms that grow too large are broken up and the land redistributed.
Proposed: Farm size regulations are determined by local governments.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Commercial fishing regulation.
Old value:: The government establishes fishing quotas.
Current: The government establishes fishing quotas.
Proposed: Local governments can establish fishing quotas
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 07:07:53, February 26, 2010 CET | From | 國民進步保守黨 Nat'l Tory Bloc | To | Debating the Agricultural Reform October 2899 |
Message | OOC: There is no "federal" government in Indrala. Since there is an east asian twist/theme, it would be more appropriate to call it as "Central Government" |
Date | 02:46:28, February 27, 2010 CET | From | The Progressive Party | To | Debating the Agricultural Reform October 2899 |
Message | OOC: Excuse the semantics. Sorry. |
Date | 18:35:57, February 27, 2010 CET | From | The Progressive Party | To | Debating the Agricultural Reform October 2899 |
Message | Do we support the legislation? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes |
Total Seats: 306 | ||
no | Total Seats: 379 | ||
abstain |
Total Seats: 65 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "Radical left-wing ideologies must be stamped out." - Franklin McCarthy, former Solentian politician |