We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Religious clothing Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hutori Reformists
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2908
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The state's policy concerning religious clothing.
Old value:: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Current: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Proposed: Public officials are not allowed to wear religious symbols while exercising their duties.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 15:10:56, March 14, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Religious clothing Bill |
Message | Samuel Haskins, HNP Deputy Leader : Mr Speaker, our stance on religion should know be known by all parties. We feel there is no place for religion in our society and hopefully this Act will be another step in the right direction for the suppression of religions |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 152 | |||
no | Total Seats: 44 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 195 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." - John Dalberg-Acton |