We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Administrative Reform Act of 2136
Details
Submitted by[?]: Islamic Nationalist Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2137
Description[?]:
| A BILL to rename Parliament and the Head of State. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The formal title of the Head of State.
Old value:: President
Current: Cakaniye Cumhuriyeti Başkanı (President of the Jakanian Republic)
Proposed: Bureaucrat-in-Chief
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The official title of the legislative assembly.
Old value:: Parliament
Current: Cumhuriyet Meclisi (Assembly of the Republic)
Proposed: Chamber of Bureaucrats
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:51:46, November 05, 2005 CET | From |  Islamic Nationalist Front | To | Debating the Administrative Reform Act of 2136 |
| Message | I was considering Chamber of Bureaucrats or Special Interest Bordello, so if you prefer one of those, tell me and I'll change it if there's enough support for it. |
| Date | 11:54:16, November 05, 2005 CET | From | Ogden Sinclair Party | To | Debating the Administrative Reform Act of 2136 |
| Message | I dont see beaurocracy as a bad thing (within reason) so I really dont care. I think we should go for something triumphalist, I'm not sure what though. First Minister of The People, and the Supreme Peoples Assembly |
| Date | 14:05:33, November 05, 2005 CET | From | Islamic Nationalist Front | To | Debating the Administrative Reform Act of 2136 |
| Message | Does that seem cliche to anyone else? |
| Date | 14:08:38, November 05, 2005 CET | From | Islamic Nationalist Front | To | Debating the Administrative Reform Act of 2136 |
| Message | Anyway, I'm not changing the proposals to anything populist. I'm waiting to hear if LS or NP would support this. |
| Date | 15:01:12, November 05, 2005 CET | From | Jakanian Liberal Socialists | To | Debating the Administrative Reform Act of 2136 |
| Message | I think Chamber of Bureaucrats sounds better. I'd ask that this be a temporary thing though. I never saw the JCP's history that he wrote, so if he could post that sometime that'd be great. Otherwise, I'm gonna write my own and submit it for review by you guys. I think it'd be cool if we could base any permanent names on our agreed history. |
| Date | 00:52:52, November 06, 2005 CET | From | Jakanian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Administrative Reform Act of 2136 |
| Message | OOC: LS, basically, if you have written a history, post it and I'll take it and edit and repost it and we can go from there. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 212 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 38 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life fictional references (eg. Gandalf, Harry Potter, Luke Skywalker). |
| Random quote: "A good politician is quite as unthinkable as an honest burglar." - H. L. Mencken |