Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5481
Next month in: 01:11:13
Server time: 22:48:46, May 10, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): HopesFor | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Unions and Workers Act of 2937

Details

Submitted by[?]: Socialist Alliance

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2938

Description[?]:

For the freedom of the working man

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date01:28:24, May 12, 2010 CET
From New Aloria Party (NAP)
ToDebating the Unions and Workers Act of 2937
MessageYou have no solid argument for article 1.
Article 2- Certian people could go on strike with no reasonable ground for any reason and the owner would have to do whatever they wanted because his business would fail since he can't fire them.
Article 3- Let's say all the police go on strike, a riot starts well were in trouble or what about if the the army went on strike during the attacks that just happened.

Date01:30:34, May 12, 2010 CET
From Socialist Alliance
ToDebating the Unions and Workers Act of 2937
MessageWe prioritise the freedom of the working man over that of the capitalists businessman

We also trust our police and army to be there in case of a national emergency.

And if we want to stop strikes in the first place, let's treat our workers well

Date01:45:23, May 12, 2010 CET
From New Aloria Party (NAP)
ToDebating the Unions and Workers Act of 2937
MessageI want to know what is wrong with child labour? WHEN IT IS ONLY FOR FIVE HOURS AND IN THE ENTERINMENT INDUSTRY ONLY! Also it is a choice, you act like it's slavery.

Apparently you don't trust the police them enough to let them decied if a protest contains a risk to public saftey and let them to break it up peacefully.


Date10:33:00, May 13, 2010 CET
From Free Democratic Party
ToDebating the Unions and Workers Act of 2937
MessageIf the capitalist businessman has no freedom, there are no workers. We won't even consider the validity of the other two provisions while Article 2 remains in.

Date17:28:29, May 13, 2010 CET
From Genuine Progress Alliance
ToDebating the Unions and Workers Act of 2937
MessageOOC:

REAL-LIFE CASE SCENARIO:
In the case of the 1969 Montreal Police Strike, police officers went on strike due to their demands for better working conditions and compensations. This resulted in the escalation of the Murray-Hill riot due to the lack of policemen on duty.

You might want to think about that before giving absolute striking privileges to people.

Date22:01:09, May 13, 2010 CET
From New Aloria Party (NAP)
ToDebating the Unions and Workers Act of 2937
MessageThank you GPA, will you be returning to Aloria?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 233

no
     

Total Seats: 382

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar).

Random quote: "When there's a single thief, it's robbery. When there are a thousand thieves, it's taxation. " -Vanya Cohen

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 72