Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 00:43:55
Server time: 23:16:04, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Klexi | luthorian3059 | VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Budget proposal of August 2941

Details

Submitted by[?]: New Independence Party (PCA)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2942

Description[?]:

The New Independence Party (PCA) propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Democratic Republic of Aloria.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date06:29:31, May 21, 2010 CET
FromNew Independence Party (PCA)
ToDebating the Budget proposal of August 2941
MessageThis bill is substantially similar to our most recent proposal. It makes some compromises reflective of suggestions made by our coalition partners: specifically, smaller increases to Head of Government, Foreign Affairs, and Defence. A larger increase to Trade and Industry.

Date06:30:52, May 21, 2010 CET
FromNew Independence Party (PCA)
ToDebating the Budget proposal of August 2941
MessageAt this time, we feel like we're taxing our people without giving them an appropriate level of services in return. We ask that our coalition partners consider that there is some urgency to passing a budget. I've tried to at least compromise on as many concerns as I could.

Date06:33:21, May 21, 2010 CET
FromNew Aloria Party (NAP)
ToDebating the Budget proposal of August 2941
MessageWe still think Defense should be cut. It's wasteful spending on that, the reason is no MAJOR threat right now. We completely understand we have to be preapred but putting more money in it would most likely be for if we had a major threat going on right now or about to go to war or an attack or something.

OOC: I just made my own compromise just as a reference. Very sorry NIP)

Date06:34:37, May 21, 2010 CET
FromNew Aloria Party (NAP)
ToDebating the Budget proposal of August 2941
MessageAs well this one breaks Alorian Law because of Emergency Fund Act NIP, the one I suggested doesn't.

Date06:56:49, May 21, 2010 CET
FromNCPA
ToDebating the Budget proposal of August 2941
Messagethis budget is breaking the law, a law the NCPA voted to pass, sorry

Date11:01:02, May 21, 2010 CET
FromSocialist Alliance
ToDebating the Budget proposal of August 2941
MessageSupport

Date18:28:54, May 21, 2010 CET
FromNew Independence Party (PCA)
ToDebating the Budget proposal of August 2941
MessageWe've added a rider to repeal the Emergency Fund Act.

Date00:15:14, May 22, 2010 CET
FromNew Aloria Party (NAP)
ToDebating the Budget proposal of August 2941
MessageThis bill is invald. It said in the comments to repel it, no you can't do that. It does not say in the descprtion to repel it. and it needs to be in a regular bill with a deadline not the budget proposal which passes before deadline.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 335

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
        

    Total Seats: 280


    Random fact: Particracy does not allow official national flags of real-life nations or flags which are very prominent and recognisable (eg. the flags of the European Union, the United Nations, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or the Confederate States of America).

    Random quote: "The free market is ugly and stupid, like going to the mall; the unfree market is just as ugly and just as stupid, except there is nothing in the mall, and if you don't go there, they shoot you." - P. J. O'Rourke

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 62