We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Private Gun Ownership Act 2941
Details
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2942
Description[?]:
In this modern age we do not need the average citizen with the need to own a gun/s. Guns are aggravators of crime and injustice not preventers. Long term this bill will cut accidental/suicidal deaths, murders and crime in general; Killias study 2001 states that easier access to guns lead to more violence, or it could mean that larger amounts of violence lead to a higher level of gun ownership for self defense, Either one, if we can cut out the gun worngdoing is preventable, I urge the congress to pass this bill and make Aloria safer. thanks NCPA (PCA) |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Weapon concealment.
Old value:: Some categories of weapon must be carried openly, others may be concealed.
Current: Any legal weapon may be concealed when carried.
Proposed: People must first obtain a permit in order to carry concealed weapons.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Ownership of guns by private individuals.
Old value:: Adult individuals may own guns under strict license conditions.
Current: Adult individuals are allowed to own and purchase guns freely.
Proposed: Adult individuals may not own firearms unless professionally required.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 07:43:57, May 21, 2010 CET | From | New Aloria Party (NAP) | To | Debating the Private Gun Ownership Act 2941 |
Message | Article 2 do not support. Article 1.. it is good however, the current law does make some have to be carried openly. So my question is if we put article 1 byitself and it changed and article 2 current law stayed the same would it be safer or less safer. |
Date | 07:51:07, May 21, 2010 CET | From | NCPA | To | Debating the Private Gun Ownership Act 2941 |
Message | we agree that if article 1 goes through then it would at least make the street potentially safer however that is meteorically 'sweeping the issue under the carpet' we would like to see what the other parties, last time this act was pushed by the NCPA it was a close defeat so we anticipate support |
Date | 07:57:49, May 21, 2010 CET | From | New Aloria Party (NAP) | To | Debating the Private Gun Ownership Act 2941 |
Message | Ok. Support Article 1 Oppose Article 2 (OOC: Sweeping under the carpet is better then under the bed haha) |
Date | 14:25:21, May 21, 2010 CET | From | NCPA | To | Debating the Private Gun Ownership Act 2941 |
Message | article 2 will help enforce 1 while also allowing arrest to be made easily. As anyone not concealing their weapon means they are undoubtedly not obliged to carry it. I am really unsure who would need to conceal their weapon save undercover police or covert agents etc. (extreme case) I don't want the average Alorian walking around with knife concealed or something like that. |
Date | 15:46:48, May 21, 2010 CET | From | NCPA | To | Debating the Private Gun Ownership Act 2941 |
Message | OOC: PP the game has swapped the articles around, i dont know why so do you support article 1 and oppose 2 or vice versa ????? |
Date | 23:24:32, May 21, 2010 CET | From | New Aloria Party (NAP) | To | Debating the Private Gun Ownership Act 2941 |
Message | OOC: Gay! lol. Oppose Article 1 Support Article 2 |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 213 | |||
no | Total Seats: 173 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 163 |
Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
Random quote: "And what is Aleppo?" - Gary Johnson |