We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Defend our Police
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Democratic Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2138
Description[?]:
You may not care for their safety, but others do. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The weapons used by police forces.
Old value:: Police officers may only carry non-lethal weapons apart from specially trained firearms units.
Current: Police officers carry military-grade equipment.
Proposed: Police officers carry military-grade equipment.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 18:12:24, November 08, 2005 CET | From | Chinkopodian Economic Democrats | To | Debating the Defend our Police |
Message | Lethal doesn't mean safe. Just as non-lethal doesn't mean unsafe. |
Date | 19:37:26, November 08, 2005 CET | From | Social Democratic Party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Defend our Police |
Message | POLICE STATE, NAZI, STALINIST, FASCIST! |
Date | 21:53:51, November 08, 2005 CET | From | Libertarian party of Darnussia | To | Debating the Defend our Police |
Message | yeah... your so good at debating :| |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 109 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 63 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 18 |
Random fact: To see what other nations are up to and to actively involve yourself in international activities: check the Roleplaying section on the forum! Don't be shy to make a news post about your party's recent achievements. |
Random quote: "There is only one corner of the universe you can be certain of improving, and that's your own self." - Aldous Huxley |