Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5476
Next month in: 03:00:43
Server time: 20:59:16, April 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): dannypk19 | Ost | R Drax | SocDemDundorfian | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Nova Defence Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Christian People's Party (IA)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 3000

Description[?]:

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:58:10, September 14, 2010 CET
FromConstitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
ToDebating the Nova Defence Act
MessageMr Speaker,

We support articles 1 & 2 but oppose article 3. We believe that enslaving enemy soldiers will put our captured soldiers in considerable danger of being enslaved or executed, which is of course quite undesirable.

I yield.

Date18:29:15, September 14, 2010 CET
FromChristian People's Party (IA)
ToDebating the Nova Defence Act
MessageMr Speaker,

We are happy that the CIL supports articles 1 & 2, but any Empire with respect for it self need some slaves to do the "dirty jobs", plus there will be a new source of revenue and commerce in slave trade, of cause certain outlines of enslavement will have to be made, good christian men could be ransomed while heathens will be enslaved or executed. And on a closing note, Luthorian soldiers have to know the meaning of No Surrender!

I yield.

Date20:10:41, September 14, 2010 CET
FromConstitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
ToDebating the Nova Defence Act
MessageMr Speaker,

The ruling Geharon Conservative Party supports slavery as a punishment and believes certain criminals who have committed crimes that do not warrant the death penalty but that they can never hope to repay should be enslaved, however, we maintain our position against article 2. We believe that sometimes, it is wiser to surrender and fight another day than to die.

I yield.

Date11:16:31, September 15, 2010 CET
FromChristian People's Party (IA)
ToDebating the Nova Defence Act
MessageMr Speaker,

We will compromise and propose a separate slavery bill.

I yield.

Date17:00:45, September 15, 2010 CET
FromConstitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
ToDebating the Nova Defence Act
MessageMr Speaker,

We thank the CPP for their actions and will gladly support this bill.

I yield.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 86

no
   

Total Seats: 86

abstain
 

Total Seats: 29


Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost.

Random quote: "Politics is too serious a matter to be left to the politicians." - Charles de Gaulle

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 56