We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Religious Freedom Bill 2
Details
Submitted by[?]: Social Liberal Republicans (PET)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 3019
Description[?]:
| Religious schools can be a valuable addition to our state education system when they are regulated correctly |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The governments stance on religious schools.
Old value:: Religious schools are not allowed.
Current: Religious schools are allowed, but are strictly regulated. Only recognised religions may set up religious schools.
Proposed: Any religion may set up a school, but they are strictly regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:27:46, October 21, 2010 CET | From |  Social Liberal Republicans (PET) | To | Debating the Religious Freedom Bill 2 |
| Message | We would like to ask other parties opinions on the following: Religious schools - we would allow any, but with strict regulations - after all, we allow companies to run schools, are religious organisations any worse? Wearing of religious clothing - we would have no regulations, but if not could we propose that public officials cannot wear religious clothing while performing their duties, or religious clothing not permited in public buildings? |
| Date | 21:29:10, October 21, 2010 CET | From | Social Liberal Republicans (PET) | To | Debating the Religious Freedom Bill 2 |
| Message | Also religions should be allowed to freely promote themselves. Let us know your thoughts please |
| Date | 21:55:49, October 21, 2010 CET | From | Popular Stability | To | Debating the Religious Freedom Bill 2 |
| Message | We oppose any attempt to push Endralon into an era of ignorance and faith, especially in regard to the deplorable intrusion of religion in education. |
| Date | 01:05:50, October 22, 2010 CET | From | People's Independence Party | To | Debating the Religious Freedom Bill 2 |
| Message | The PIP will support allowing strictly regulated Religious Schools, and lifting the regulations on religious clothing, but we believe the current religious-advertisement stance is sufficient. |
| Date | 15:13:39, October 23, 2010 CET | From | ƒortenohƒiv (ACN) | To | Debating the Religious Freedom Bill 2 |
| Message | I agree with PS, religion is a waste of time, cuts back on productivity and just hides the true face of good and evil. I think it would be more proper if there were schools set up to teach philosophy instead of religion. |
| Date | 23:32:59, October 23, 2010 CET | From | People's Independence Party | To | Debating the Religious Freedom Bill 2 |
| Message | Allowing cults to set up schools is a wrong move. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 114 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 156 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "Politics is the art of the possible." - Otto von Bismarck |