We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Redistribution II
Details
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2141
Description[?]:
| The bourgeoisie pigs shall see the wealth they have stolen off the backs of the worker return to the true creators of the wealth - the workers. The rooftops will ring with the voices of the workers, proclaiming that they are the backbone of society, and it shall be accepted for the truth it is. |
Proposals
Article 1
| Ministry | Current Budget | Old Budget | Propesed Budget |
| Head of Government | 500,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 1,000,000 LOD |
| Foreign Affairs | 4,000,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 500,000,000 LOD |
| Internal Affairs | 6,000,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 2,000,000,000 LOD |
| Finance | 1,500,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 100,000,000 LOD |
| Defence | 11,500,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 1,500,000,000 LOD |
| Justice | 5,500,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 500,000,000 LOD |
| Infrastructure and Transport | 7,500,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 2,000,000,000 LOD |
| Health and Social Services | 20,000,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 10,000,000,000 LOD |
| Education and Culture | 17,500,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 7,000,000,000 LOD |
| Science and Technology | 2,000,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 10,000,000 LOD |
| Food and Agriculture | 5,000,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 1,000,000 LOD |
| Environment and Tourism | 500,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 1,000,000,000 LOD |
| Trade and Industry | 5,500,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 1,000,000 LOD |
| Total | 87,000,000,000 LOD | 0 LOD | 24,613,000,000 LOD |
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 05:36:28, November 14, 2005 CET | From | International Society of Bankers | To | Debating the Redistribution II |
| Message | You do realize we are in a deficit? |
| Date | 21:55:57, November 14, 2005 CET | From | CNT/AFL | To | Debating the Redistribution II |
| Message | The only reason we are running a deficit is because of the irresponsibility of some parties who voted to abolish taxation alltogther. |
| Date | 03:47:09, November 15, 2005 CET | From | CNT/AFL | To | Debating the Redistribution II |
| Message | The proposed spending bill would more than cover this budget. |
| Date | 20:59:27, November 15, 2005 CET | From | Juche Front (The Resistance) | To | Debating the Redistribution II |
| Message | Defence needs more than that. But the LLC will back our comrades on this. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 133 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 167 | ||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented |
| Random quote: "You have to remember one thing about the will of the people: it wasn't that long ago that we were swept away by the Macarena." - Jon Stewart |