We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Devolution of the Regulation of Adoption
Details
Submitted by[?]: Covenanters (IA)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2141
Description[?]:
| Given the Sejm's rejection of the peoples' will, http://82.238.75.178:8085/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=29581, this party proposes the peoples' second favourite option. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning adoption.
Old value:: Adoption is strictly regulated by the government. Only by passing several tests and by following an intensive program applicants can adopt children.
Current: Adoption is regulated by the government. Applicants can adopt after a routine check-up.
Proposed: Adoption policy is to be established by local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:10:52, November 14, 2005 CET | From | United Conservative Party | To | Debating the Devolution of the Regulation of Adoption |
| Message | Please add: ... established by local governments in consultation with Christian Churches. And: All sodomists are forever banned from applying ... right up until they burn! |
| Date | 16:50:09, November 14, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Devolution of the Regulation of Adoption |
| Message | Who can adopt is a different law. Feel free to propose that only straight couples can adopt. You will get our votes. |
| Date | 21:44:28, November 14, 2005 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the Devolution of the Regulation of Adoption |
| Message | This is not a confederacy; 'tis a Commonwealth (and an Imperial one at that). While we will be voting yes, we are getting a bit concerned that so much is going to local governments and so little to national. |
| Date | 22:06:15, November 14, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Devolution of the Regulation of Adoption |
| Message | Speaking of the Imperial Commonwealth, who would support a name change to the Holy Luthori Empire? |
| Date | 23:41:45, November 14, 2005 CET | From | United Conservative Party | To | Debating the Devolution of the Regulation of Adoption |
| Message | Holy Luthori Empire? Sounds good. Who will lead the established Church? When do we start building the empire? |
| Date | 03:10:46, November 15, 2005 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the Devolution of the Regulation of Adoption |
| Message | If we become a "Holy Luthori Empire," I'm going to lead a revolution in the coastal vovoidships, and start a free and secular Commonwealth, the true Rzeczpospolita. |
| Date | 07:55:50, November 15, 2005 CET | From | United Conservative Party | To | Debating the Devolution of the Regulation of Adoption |
| Message | That sounds like sedition and treason to me. I hereby impeach LEC for being a traitor! His own words condemn him: "I'm going to lead a revolution in the coastal vovoidships, and start a free and secular Commonwealth." BURN HIM!!! |
| Date | 09:22:19, November 15, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Devolution of the Regulation of Adoption |
| Message | Should we not shoot him for treachery? |
| Date | 15:07:49, November 15, 2005 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the Devolution of the Regulation of Adoption |
| Message | Um, I said IF, as in hypothetical, in the future tense. It was a warning. |
| Date | 19:14:58, November 15, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Devolution of the Regulation of Adoption |
| Message | Conspiracy is still a crime, and we have your confession on public record. Arrest that man! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 388 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 161 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 201 |
| Random fact: Role-play is most enjoyable and successful when there is good communication and friendly relations between all players involved. |
| Random quote: "We had no domestic attacks under Bush." - Rudy Giuliani |