Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:54:01
Server time: 20:05:58, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of July 3039

Details

Submitted by[?]: New Aloria Party (NAP)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 3040

Description[?]:

IP has 3 reason why because they have Head of Government.
CLS has 4
CDP has 3
I myself have 3.

I think this is fair.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date06:35:23, December 03, 2010 CET
From Labour Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3039
MessageLooks good, but why are you giving the smallest party here Head Of Government? That seems a bit odd to me dosen't it? Still voting yes anyway

Date06:38:46, December 03, 2010 CET
From New Aloria Party (NAP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3039
MessageI don't look at how large the party is. I gave it to them because I trust them more then you or the CLS not to be rude but that's the truth. I hope that doesnt come off rude.

Date06:41:40, December 03, 2010 CET
From Labour Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3039
Messageno it does not come off rude because I don't trust you a single bit either. I wouldn't even trust you to look after my belongings not even for a second

Date06:42:46, December 03, 2010 CET
From New Aloria Party (NAP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3039
MessageOk then were good. I'll await to see what the CLS thinks. I know the IP will like it.

Date06:54:23, December 03, 2010 CET
From Congress of Libertarian Socialists
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3039
MessageI'm game.

Date06:55:28, December 03, 2010 CET
From New Aloria Party (NAP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3039
MessageOk will put it to vote. Burton will be sending messages to Ministers about different issues.

Date13:51:53, December 03, 2010 CET
From United Independent Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3039
Messageill vote..

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 750

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain

      Total Seats: 0


      Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

      Random quote: "Any law which violates the inalienable rights of man is essentially unjust and tyrannical; it is not a law at all." - Maximilien Robespierre

      This page was generated with PHP
      Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
      Queries performed: 58