We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of July 3039
Details
Submitted by[?]: New Aloria Party (NAP)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 3040
Description[?]:
IP has 3 reason why because they have Head of Government. CLS has 4 CDP has 3 I myself have 3. I think this is fair. |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the United Independent Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Labour Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Congress of Libertarian Socialists
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Congress of Libertarian Socialists
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the United Independent Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Labour Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Labour Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Congress of Libertarian Socialists
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the New Aloria Party (NAP)
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the New Aloria Party (NAP)
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Congress of Libertarian Socialists
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the United Independent Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the New Aloria Party (NAP)
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 06:35:23, December 03, 2010 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3039 |
Message | Looks good, but why are you giving the smallest party here Head Of Government? That seems a bit odd to me dosen't it? Still voting yes anyway |
Date | 06:38:46, December 03, 2010 CET | From | New Aloria Party (NAP) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3039 |
Message | I don't look at how large the party is. I gave it to them because I trust them more then you or the CLS not to be rude but that's the truth. I hope that doesnt come off rude. |
Date | 06:41:40, December 03, 2010 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3039 |
Message | no it does not come off rude because I don't trust you a single bit either. I wouldn't even trust you to look after my belongings not even for a second |
Date | 06:42:46, December 03, 2010 CET | From | New Aloria Party (NAP) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3039 |
Message | Ok then were good. I'll await to see what the CLS thinks. I know the IP will like it. |
Date | 06:54:23, December 03, 2010 CET | From | Congress of Libertarian Socialists | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3039 |
Message | I'm game. |
Date | 06:55:28, December 03, 2010 CET | From | New Aloria Party (NAP) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3039 |
Message | Ok will put it to vote. Burton will be sending messages to Ministers about different issues. |
Date | 13:51:53, December 03, 2010 CET | From | United Independent Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 3039 |
Message | ill vote.. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 750 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "Any law which violates the inalienable rights of man is essentially unjust and tyrannical; it is not a law at all." - Maximilien Robespierre |