Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 02:10:01
Server time: 01:49:58, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of November 3042

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Independent Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 3043

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:16:46, December 09, 2010 CET
FromNew Aloria Party (NAP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3042
MessageKEEP IT IN DEBATE!

Date23:18:09, December 09, 2010 CET
FromUnited Independent Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3042
Messageyep

Date23:19:25, December 09, 2010 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3042
MessageNo, no, no, no, no, no, no the old one was way better, this one is just unequal and can I please still hold onto foreign affairs?? I don't care if thats the only position I have, I wan't the foreign affairs

Date23:24:14, December 09, 2010 CET
FromUnited Independent Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3042
Messagenot to be stupid or rude.. but hy? i think head of state desrves it.. why do you?

Date23:27:38, December 09, 2010 CET
FromNew Aloria Party (NAP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3042
MessageYou have 4 CDP...

I will say I believe the Head of State should have that position.

Date23:34:21, December 09, 2010 CET
FromLabour Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3042
MessageBut then remember before, PP when you were Head of State, I always had foreign affairs remember? Why have you suddenly changed your mind?

Date23:44:24, December 09, 2010 CET
FromNew Aloria Party (NAP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3042
MessageCDP, I did tell you that I believe the Head of State should have it but I didnt want it so that's why I gave it to you. I'm not head of state this time.

Date23:51:12, December 09, 2010 CET
FromUnited Independent Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3042
Messagewell ill take it i think head deserves it cause i made this far but more imprtant. head is to deal with foreign

Date06:22:05, December 10, 2010 CET
FromNew Aloria Party (NAP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3042
MessageNow it won't pass since the CDP is voting no.

CDP, just because you don't get your one position you vote no. You have 4 positions.

Date12:50:44, December 10, 2010 CET
FromUnited Independent Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3042
MessageCDP u sore fucking loser get over it i would think u wouldn't log on theirs protests in London for commies as yourself.so just get over it...besides it should pass cause i outrank the seats PP...

Date16:13:49, December 10, 2010 CET
FromAlorian Workers Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3042
MessageDue to UIP outlandish and unnecessary childish reply we too will be voting no.

Date22:01:26, December 10, 2010 CET
FromNew Aloria Party (NAP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3042
MessageTo have a cabinet proposal pass all the parties inculde in the proposal must be passed.

I'm a little tired of this.

CDP: You vote no because you don't get the one seat you want that's how I'm seeing it, you however are given 4 positions. I believe that is in plain and simple terms bull crap to vote no. I don't mean to put that as rude to you I'm just a very blunt person and say what I think. Sorry.

AWP: This will gets us no where.

UIP: You need to watch your responses to people, we all have our breaking points and have to let out a little steam I have as well. But we need to watch it cause it will get us no where to say that.

I understand the UIP saying he is being a sore loser, and to be honest it does seam the CDP is acting like that just because they dont get one seat, they vote agasint the whole cabinet thing instead of accepting it. The term of cussing let's not say that. If you think someone's a sore loser tell them "To be honest I believe your being a sore loser" not a "fucking sore loser".

I have been guilty of not showing respect OOC in this game but, we all have or will be.

Let's move on.

CDP and AWP I urge you to vote yes.

UIP: Please watch what you say.

Date22:42:07, December 10, 2010 CET
FromAlorian Workers Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3042
MessageIf the verbal attacks cease then we will support the cabinet. However, if the FMLP and the ACP were included then we feel the CLS (with 98 seats) should have been included too. Despite this, we doubt the FMLP, ACP, or CLS will either approve or disprove this cabinet.

Date22:46:59, December 10, 2010 CET
FromAlorian Workers Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3042
MessageOOC: *disapprove

IC: Also, we congratulate the PP for keeping a level head.

Date22:47:06, December 10, 2010 CET
FromNew Aloria Party (NAP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3042
MessageThe CLS will be inactive by trmmw.

Do we want to not inculde the FMLP or ACP until they are on more?

Date22:48:32, December 10, 2010 CET
FromAlorian Workers Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3042
MessageUntil they are more activate it would probably be a good idea not to include them.

Date22:50:34, December 10, 2010 CET
FromNew Aloria Party (NAP)
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3042
MessageOk then I ask the UIP make a new proposal with only my party, their party, the AWP and the CDP.

However if the CDP does not get foregin affiars I hope they will vote yes still.

Date01:25:36, December 11, 2010 CET
FromUnited Independent Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3042
Messageok im sorry about the outbrst. ill make the cabinet

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 497

no
 

Total Seats: 155

abstain
    

Total Seats: 98


Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer".

Random quote: "Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber." - Plato

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 79