We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Unification Act 3071
Details
Submitted by[?]: Coalition for National Unity [CNU]
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 3072
Description[?]:
| Binding together finally and utterly the Halion and Calydon Duel-Governance, Restoring the Historial Titular traditions and absorbing the modern interpretation of the role of the Head of Government as a keeper of the balance between Senate and Executive. Written and Proposed by: Lysander Seymour, Chancellor of the Unionist Party and inheritant Lord Protector. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The title of the head of government, who chairs the cabinet.
Old value:: Premier
Current: Governor
Proposed: Senate Warden and Lord Protector of the Federal Republic of Solentia
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The formal title of the Head of State.
Old value:: President of the Republic of Solentia
Current: President
Proposed: Supreme President of the Federal Republic of Solentia
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:46:58, February 04, 2011 CET | From | Meritocratic Alliance | To | Debating the Unification Act 3071 |
| Message | We support |
| Date | 22:19:43, February 04, 2011 CET | From | Conservative Party of Solentia | To | Debating the Unification Act 3071 |
| Message | OOC: I'd drop the "of the Federal Republic of Solentia" pieces, but that's just me... IC: "Mr. Premier, The CPS finds the 'Lord Protector' title to be ethereal at best. It is a relic of monarchism which has never, and will never, be accepted tradition or government in the Federal Republic of Solentia. Just as the FHE obstructs tradition in order to maintain the 'Presidency' and 'Premiership,' the Unionist and Whig continuation of the 'dual government' issue is impeding a return to sanity for Solentia. The Whigs' brazen threats in the debate of FIP SR 222 are telling: This is a bloc which will stop at no line to achieve their ends. An admittance of the title of 'Lord Protector' now will be an admittance of landed aristocracy and hereditary monarchy tomorrow. The proper Solentian tradition is Supreme Presidency supported by Senate Wardenship; there is no room for aristocratic titles in Solentia or Solentian government! No to this proposal!" Aaron Redman, CPS Chairman |
| Date | 22:31:38, February 04, 2011 CET | From | Conservative Party of Solentia | To | Debating the Unification Act 3071 |
| Message | "Mr. Premier, One final comment: The CPS was under the impression from the Unionist-maintained Supreme President List (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=234675) that the unification of Solentia was complete. There is no government in Calydon. President Bayless is my President, is he the President of the Unionist and Whig parties, or are they still embracing monarchist separatism? I yield the floor." Aaron Redman |
| Date | 14:31:07, February 05, 2011 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the Unification Act 3071 |
| Message | OOC: The Supreme President List is OOC and is never complete. Althought it doesn't list the Lord Protector's beyond Woolsingham (as none of the followers used the title after him), it does still list the current heads of state under the Duel Governance section. IC: "As has already been explained, the title Lord Protector is a defensive one designed to protect the Solentian citizenry and legislature from tyranny; nuncirist, communist, absolute monarchist or otherwise. The Senate Warden, we feel, is only empowered by this Act to carry an additional duty of monitoring Executive power. I see no harm in that as long as the Presidential authority is supreme once more. I also note that the CPS may object to titles, however this Government does recognise titles by means of the Social Incentive and Titles Act 3041 (http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=306870)." Lysander Seymour, Unionist Chancellor |
| Date | 14:39:53, February 05, 2011 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the Unification Act 3071 |
| Message | "I have been instructed by Protector Seymour, who is presently in Calydon, to put this to vote and have done with it." Pete Jier, Chairman of 2616 Committee |
| Date | 18:42:10, February 05, 2011 CET | From | Meritocratic Alliance | To | Debating the Unification Act 3071 |
| Message | Oh I see the Laptop Party has shown up to vote. Bravo. |
| Date | 23:20:15, February 05, 2011 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the Unification Act 3071 |
| Message | "And so the FIP and CPS both oppose the restoration...what an interesting development." Peter Jier, Chairman of the 2616 Committee |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 96 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 198 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 131 |
| Random fact: Particracy isn't just a game, it also has a forum, where players meet up to discuss role-playing, talk about in-game stuff, run their own newspaper or organisation and even discuss non-game and real-life issues! Check it out: http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "And I said on my program, if, if the Americans go in and overthrow Saddam Hussein and it's clean, he has nothing, I will apologize to the nation, and I will not trust the Bush Administration again." - Bill O'Reilly |