We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Return to Progress Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Labour Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 3075
Description[?]:
| A demand for change to end unfair laws still present in Aloria from the Imperialist Era |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards daily working hours.
Old value:: The government has no policy concerning daily working hours.
Current: The government obligates trade unions and employers to negotiate the daily number of working hours.
Proposed: The government obligates trade unions and employers to negotiate the daily number of working hours.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on industry and subsidies to industrial operations.
Old value:: The government does not intervene in the market nor provide any form of subsidies/relief to industries.
Current: Certain industries are owned by the state, all others are under private ownership.
Proposed: The government acts as an investor of last resort, by nationalizing failing industries that provide vital goods or services.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Positive discrimination.
Old value:: Hiring policies are regulated by local governments.
Current: The government sets compulsory quotas for hiring women, minorities and marginalized groups.
Proposed: No form of positive discrimination is permitted.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:49:50, February 10, 2011 CET | From |  New Aloria Party | To | Debating the Return to Progress Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We can not support this legislation. I yield. |
| Date | 13:56:25, February 10, 2011 CET | From | Progressive Democratic Party | To | Debating the Return to Progress Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We would support articles 2,3 and 5 I yield |
| Date | 20:07:13, February 10, 2011 CET | From | Christian Democratic Party | To | Debating the Return to Progress Act |
| Message | Mr. Speaker, We can only support articles 2, 3, 4. We will not vote if favor of this if article 1 is left in. We are unsure about article 5. If those that we support are left, we will vote for this, the others, specially article 5 we can not promise our support. I yield |
| Date | 07:12:43, February 11, 2011 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Return to Progress Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, Whilst we may not agree with the CDP's demands we have tailor made our proposal for them to ensure their support. We hope they are true to their word and vote yes. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes |
Total Seats: 458 | ||
| no |
Total Seats: 292 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: It is possible for a player to transfer ownership of a character or a royal house to another player. This should be done in a public way, such as on the Character Transfers thread, so that if a dispute arises in the future, Moderation can be pointed towards evidence of the transfer. |
| Random quote: “Tell these old, grey men that their time is over. Tell them to give us back our future, and then get lost!” - Benji Benandez, former Dranian politician |