We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Crackdown on AIDS and other STI'S
Details
Submitted by[?]: Labour Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 3095
Description[?]:
| While I may not agree with having sex just for the sake of it, there are some clowns in Aloria who do. That is why we need to provide a subsidsed although not free contraception service to make sure people who have sex will decrease their chances off getting an STI drastically. That is why I believe why should have cheaper contraceptives, not because I agree with people having sex for fun and don't want children but it will decrease a person's chance of contracting an STI. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on subsidising contraception.
Old value:: The government does not supply free or discounted contraceptives.
Current: The government offers free contraceptives in pharmacies and public toilets.
Proposed: The government subsidises a considerable discount for contraceptives.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 22:43:54, March 23, 2011 CET | From | New Aloria Party (NAP) | To | Debating the Crackdown on AIDS and other STI'S |
| Message | I'll vote for it because I'm all for having sex for just the fun of it lmao. |
| Date | 23:58:59, March 23, 2011 CET | From | Revolutionary Worker's Party | To | Debating the Crackdown on AIDS and other STI'S |
| Message | While I don't understand the Labour Party's opinion on having sexual relations for pleasure (which we find quite reactionary for a party that calls itself socialist [or atleast that's what I heard]), we agree completely that the state should subsidize contraceptives, for it will reduce the transmission of STI's and also reduce unwanted children, teenage pregnants, and abortions (since it's better to prevent). OOC: How about some roleplay guys? It doesn't really seem you're talking in parliament |
| Date | 07:39:15, March 24, 2011 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Crackdown on AIDS and other STI'S |
| Message | OOC; yes I agree with more role playing, but what do you mean by "It doesn't really seem you're talking in parliament" RWP, the only reason why we're doing this is so that we can prevent STI's. Why would people have hardcore sex for pleasure? I'm not just meaning kissing or sex for babies but like downright dirty oral sex, threesomes and fingering, I have no idea why anyone would want to even think about doing that? Would you? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 198 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 388 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 164 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "From my point of view, the killing of another, except in defense of human life, is archistic, authoritarian, and therefore, no anarchist can commit such deeds. It is the very opposite of what anarchism stands for." - Jo Labadie |