We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Removal of Prime Minister
Details
Submitted by[?]: New Aloria Party (NAP)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 3139
Description[?]:
| "The spot of the Prime Minister has wasted taxpayer money foolishly and their is no reason to have the position, the President is head of the exeuctive branch, the Prime Minister is getting to much power and he should not be the Head of Government, it is the President who should be in charge of the cabinet. People elect the President, not the Prime Minister."-President Donald King |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Structure of the executive branch.
Old value:: The Head of State and Head of Government are two separate officials.
Current: The Head of State is also Head of Government.
Proposed: The Head of State is also Head of Government.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:52:44, June 19, 2011 CET | From | Alorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Removal of Prime Minister |
| Message | The Conservative Party strongly opposes this bill. We perceive this as an attempt to expand complete control over all the political institutions in Aloria, and impose a complete authoritative control over the country. Chairman of the Conservative Party- Milan K. |
| Date | 04:15:14, June 19, 2011 CET | From | Social Democrats Union | To | Debating the Removal of Prime Minister |
| Message | You are Americanising things too much and this is coming from a German. |
| Date | 04:51:56, June 19, 2011 CET | From | Social Democrats Union | To | Debating the Removal of Prime Minister |
| Message | Also, if thats your argument that the President is the one who is elected therefore they should get the power. If thats the case, then why don't we just make this an elective totalitarianism and let the President control everything? After all the finance minister wasn't elected, nor was the foreign affairs minister, neither was the defence minister and so on. |
| Date | 09:10:41, June 19, 2011 CET | From | Popular Union | To | Debating the Removal of Prime Minister |
| Message | This is a Semi-Presidential nation and therefore the executive SHOULD be separated between the Prime Minister and the Parliament. We strongly oppose this move towards Presidentialism. |
| Date | 14:58:09, June 19, 2011 CET | From | Democratic Union Party | To | Debating the Removal of Prime Minister |
| Message | We agree with this proposal! Centralized government is the way to go. |
| Date | 20:50:44, June 20, 2011 CET | From | New Aloria Party (NAP) | To | Debating the Removal of Prime Minister |
| Message | The President should be head of the executive branch not the prime minister, the prime minister is never elected and is having to much power. This is just making the President a figure head. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 217 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In cases where players introduce RP laws to a nation and then leave, Moderation reserves the discretion to declare the RP laws void if they appear to have fallen into disuse. In particular, please bear in mind that a player who is inexperienced with Particracy role-play and has joined a nation as the only party there should not generally be expected to abide by RP laws implemented by previous players who have been and left. |
| Random quote: "In an underdeveloped country, don't drink the water; in a developed country, don't breathe the air." - Changing Times magazine |